The Iraqi State Council: Between Centralized Operations And Increasing Judicial Burden - A Comparative Study

An institution has emerged that is concerned with legal tasks of a technical and scientific nature. It is responsible for drafting and analyzing legislative texts and providing legal opinions to the state when confronting crises and problems of a constitutional or administrative nature. It also plays a role in resolving disputes that arise between citizens and administrative authorities. The State Council constitutes a pivotal pillar in the legal system of the modern state, combining advisory functions that provide legal guidance to the public administration through the drafting of legislation and the issuance of fatwas, with judicial functions that monitor the legitimacy of administrative decisions and protect public rights and freedoms. This makes it a vital tool for achieving administrative justice and the rule of law. In Iraq, the advisory function is regulated by Article (101) of the 2005 Constitution and Article (6) of Law No. (65) of 1979, which define the Council's powers in issuing fatwas and drafting legislation. The study reveals that the centralized nature of the Iraqi State Council directly affects the distribution of the judicial burden. The concentration of the Council's powers in Baghdad, without effective administrative or judicial branches in the governorates, leads to the accumulation of files and delays in resolving disputes, and limits the ability to... Equal access to administrative justice among citizens, in conflict with the principle of equality before the judiciary guaranteed by the constitution, has been challenged. The study concluded that the Iraqi Council of State's administrative subordination to the Ministry of Justice constitutes a fundamental restriction on the Council's independence in providing legal advice and adjudicating administrative cases. The influence of the executive branch on the appointment of advisors or the issuance of fatwas leads to a loss of impartiality and threatens the principle of separation of powers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63677/jqlap.2025.190965
Primary Topic
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Iraqi State Council: Between Centralized Operations And Increasing Judicial Burden - A Comparative Study

Saleem Al Salami
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
article

The Iraqi State Council: Between Centralized Operations And Increasing Judicial Burden - A Comparative Study

Saleem Al Salami
article en

Abstract

An institution has emerged that is concerned with legal tasks of a technical and scientific nature. It is responsible for drafting and analyzing legislative texts and providing legal opinions to the state when confronting crises and problems of a constitutional or administrative nature. It also plays a role in resolving disputes that arise between citizens and administrative authorities. The State Council constitutes a pivotal pillar in the legal system of the modern state, combining advisory functions that provide legal guidance to the public administration through the drafting of legislation and the issuance of fatwas, with judicial functions that monitor the legitimacy of administrative decisions and protect public rights and freedoms. This makes it a vital tool for achieving administrative justice and the rule of law. In Iraq, the advisory function is regulated by Article (101) of the 2005 Constitution and Article (6) of Law No. (65) of 1979, which define the Council's powers in issuing fatwas and drafting legislation. The study reveals that the centralized nature of the Iraqi State Council directly affects the distribution of the judicial burden. The concentration of the Council's powers in Baghdad, without effective administrative or judicial branches in the governorates, leads to the accumulation of files and delays in resolving disputes, and limits the ability to... Equal access to administrative justice among citizens, in conflict with the principle of equality before the judiciary guaranteed by the constitution, has been challenged. The study concluded that the Iraqi Council of State's administrative subordination to the Ministry of Justice constitutes a fundamental restriction on the Council's independence in providing legal advice and adjudicating administrative cases. The influence of the executive branch on the appointment of advisors or the issuance of fatwas leads to a loss of impartiality and threatens the principle of separation of powers.

AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political SciencesVol. 16(Issue: 2 part 2)
Islamic Azad University of Najafabad (IR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Judicial and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.