The Private International Law Framework for Credit Ratings (An Analytical Study)

This article analyzes the legal framework governing private international law in addressing cross-border disputes over credit ratings, highlighting the experiences of the United States and the European Union as important models in this context. It seeks to examine the significant damages that investors harmed by erroneous credit ratings may suffer, and the difficulties they face when attempting to seek compensation against credit rating agencies. The challenges facing these investors are not limited to the difficulty of proving damages or the requirements of substantive law, but extend to a broader framework related to the regulatory constraints of private international law, with the exception, to some extent, of the uniform American and European legal system of civil liability, as stipulated in Article 35/A of Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009. However, the problem continues to be exacerbated by the lack of clarity in determining the applicable law, in addition to the international system's lack of uniform mechanisms for determining the competent court and settling cross-border disputes within the field of financial markets law. In this context, this article examines potential options for reforming private international law rules, with the aim of enhancing investors' access to justice in disputes with credit rating agencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63677/jqlap.2025.191171
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Private International Law Framework for Credit Ratings (An Analytical Study)

Rasha Abokalal
AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political Sciences
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

The Private International Law Framework for Credit Ratings (An Analytical Study)

Rasha Abokalal
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal framework governing private international law in addressing cross-border disputes over credit ratings, highlighting the experiences of the United States and the European Union as important models in this context. It seeks to examine the significant damages that investors harmed by erroneous credit ratings may suffer, and the difficulties they face when attempting to seek compensation against credit rating agencies. The challenges facing these investors are not limited to the difficulty of proving damages or the requirements of substantive law, but extend to a broader framework related to the regulatory constraints of private international law, with the exception, to some extent, of the uniform American and European legal system of civil liability, as stipulated in Article 35/A of Regulation (EC) No. 1060/2009. However, the problem continues to be exacerbated by the lack of clarity in determining the applicable law, in addition to the international system's lack of uniform mechanisms for determining the competent court and settling cross-border disputes within the field of financial markets law. In this context, this article examines potential options for reforming private international law rules, with the aim of enhancing investors' access to justice in disputes with credit rating agencies.

AL-Qadisiya Journal For Law and Political SciencesVol. 16(Issue: 2 part 2)
University of Kufa (IQ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.