Integrating low-carbon goals into petroleum enterprises: tax reforms and financial strategies

This study will look at how financial, environmental and policy related factors will determine the valuation of the firms in the petroleum industry in terms of Tobin’s Q. Based on a fixed-effects panel model of 142 firms in the petroleum industry based in 2010–2023, we examine the impact of carbon intensity, emission intensity, corporate leverage, profitability, retained earnings, revenue growth, and regulatory mechanisms. The findings indicate that environmental inefficiency, especially the intensity of emission and carbon intensity, significantly decreases the market valuation, with a 1 standard deviation change in the intensity of emission leading to about a 50–53% decrease in the Q of Tobin among samples. The operating profit margin is among the most robust positive valuation drivers, whereas leverage and dividend payouts have a consistent positive influence. The retained earnings represent few economic implications, and revenue growth portrays few yet statistically strong effects, which imply that financial fundamentals are important but have a small influence when compared with the environmental performance. The asymmetric effects are realized in the policy variables: in an environment where the emission trading system (ETS) operates, firms attract stricter valuation punishments on the carbon- and energy-related inefficiency, and investor sensitivity is more pronounced. Renewable investment tax credits (TCRI) have a low yet significant negative relationship with valuation, possibly because of short-run capital commitments, delayed payoffs, or distrust towards policy credibility. These findings highlight the need to combine financial stability and environmental responsibility, particularly with the deepening global decarbonization requirements. Politically, the results also point to the key role of carbon taxes and the strength of controls in forming investor expectations and the firm value, which implies that a well-designed, credible transition incentive is critical to solving the behavior of the market and the climate goals. The paper adds to the existing literature on sustainable finance by providing a multidimensional empirical model of the assessment of the petroleum companies in the time of the low-carbon transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06940-7
Primary Topic
Natural Resources and Economic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating low-carbon goals into petroleum enterprises: tax reforms and financial strategies

Xin Huang, Rui Hua Wang, Feng Sheng Li, Yang Liu
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Natural Resources and Economic Development
article

Integrating low-carbon goals into petroleum enterprises: tax reforms and financial strategies

Xin Huang, Rui Hua Wang, Feng Sheng Li, Yang Liu
article en

Abstract

This study will look at how financial, environmental and policy related factors will determine the valuation of the firms in the petroleum industry in terms of Tobin’s Q. Based on a fixed-effects panel model of 142 firms in the petroleum industry based in 2010–2023, we examine the impact of carbon intensity, emission intensity, corporate leverage, profitability, retained earnings, revenue growth, and regulatory mechanisms. The findings indicate that environmental inefficiency, especially the intensity of emission and carbon intensity, significantly decreases the market valuation, with a 1 standard deviation change in the intensity of emission leading to about a 50–53% decrease in the Q of Tobin among samples. The operating profit margin is among the most robust positive valuation drivers, whereas leverage and dividend payouts have a consistent positive influence. The retained earnings represent few economic implications, and revenue growth portrays few yet statistically strong effects, which imply that financial fundamentals are important but have a small influence when compared with the environmental performance. The asymmetric effects are realized in the policy variables: in an environment where the emission trading system (ETS) operates, firms attract stricter valuation punishments on the carbon- and energy-related inefficiency, and investor sensitivity is more pronounced. Renewable investment tax credits (TCRI) have a low yet significant negative relationship with valuation, possibly because of short-run capital commitments, delayed payoffs, or distrust towards policy credibility. These findings highlight the need to combine financial stability and environmental responsibility, particularly with the deepening global decarbonization requirements. Politically, the results also point to the key role of carbon taxes and the strength of controls in forming investor expectations and the firm value, which implies that a well-designed, credible transition incentive is critical to solving the behavior of the market and the climate goals. The paper adds to the existing literature on sustainable finance by providing a multidimensional empirical model of the assessment of the petroleum companies in the time of the low-carbon transition.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Northeast Petroleum University (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Natural Resources and Economic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.