Novel Sampling and Sample Preparation Systems with Industrial Validation for Biomass–Coal Co-Combustion Ratios Based on 14C Determination

Focusing on enhancing the performance of the 14C method in determining biomass–coal co-combustion ratios, this study developed two novel sample preparation systems: a direct flue gas injection benzene synthesis system based on Liquid Scintillation Counting (LSC) and a direct flue gas sealing graphitization system based on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS). These systems reduced sample preparation time from 20–24 h to 6–8 h. Experimental validation showed relative errors in biomass blending ratios (1–40%) below ±4% for LSC and ±3% for AMS, except at the 1% blending condition. Compared with conventional methods, both accuracy and efficiency were significantly improved. An enhanced 14C-based industrial measurement scheme was established and successfully applied for monitoring biomass blending ratios (15–50%) in industrial facilities. Deviations between AMS and LSC were within ±3%, confirming the method’s accuracy, despite discrepancies with the Distributed Control System (DCS) estimates. Additionally, predictive formulas for 14C activity in biomass and air CO2 reduced economic investment, with relative errors from ±0.04% to ±3.25%. Overall, the new scheme improved accuracy by 50%, efficiency by 60%, and reduced detection costs by 60–80%, demonstrating feasibility and practical value for industrial applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19061474
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Novel Sampling and Sample Preparation Systems with Industrial Validation for Biomass–Coal Co-Combustion Ratios Based on 14C Determination

Yinchen Wang, Zhiyang Yu, Shenming Ran, Pu Li et al.
Energies
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Novel Sampling and Sample Preparation Systems with Industrial Validation for Biomass–Coal Co-Combustion Ratios Based on 14C Determination

Yinchen Wang, Zhiyang Yu, Shenming Ran, Pu Li, Xiaohuan Wang, Zeyu Luo, Chunjiang Yu, Shanhu Lin
article en

Abstract

Focusing on enhancing the performance of the 14C method in determining biomass–coal co-combustion ratios, this study developed two novel sample preparation systems: a direct flue gas injection benzene synthesis system based on Liquid Scintillation Counting (LSC) and a direct flue gas sealing graphitization system based on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS). These systems reduced sample preparation time from 20–24 h to 6–8 h. Experimental validation showed relative errors in biomass blending ratios (1–40%) below ±4% for LSC and ±3% for AMS, except at the 1% blending condition. Compared with conventional methods, both accuracy and efficiency were significantly improved. An enhanced 14C-based industrial measurement scheme was established and successfully applied for monitoring biomass blending ratios (15–50%) in industrial facilities. Deviations between AMS and LSC were within ±3%, confirming the method’s accuracy, despite discrepancies with the Distributed Control System (DCS) estimates. Additionally, predictive formulas for 14C activity in biomass and air CO2 reduced economic investment, with relative errors from ±0.04% to ±3.25%. Overall, the new scheme improved accuracy by 50%, efficiency by 60%, and reduced detection costs by 60–80%, demonstrating feasibility and practical value for industrial applications.

EnergiesVol. 19(6)
National Institute of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy (CN), State Key Laboratory of Clean Energy Utilization, Zhejiang University of Technology (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Zhejiang University, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.