The Implicit Costs of Biodiversity Conservation: Evidence From Corporate Investment Distortion in China

ABSTRACT We examine the implicit costs of biodiversity conservation by exploiting China's Green Shield Action (GSA). Using a difference‐in‐differences approach, we find that firms in affected cities reduce investment rates by two percentage points, a 33.11% decline relative to the mean. This effect is driven by heightened local fiscal pressure—leading to tighter tax enforcement and subsidy cuts—and increased operational uncertainty. The impact is more pronounced for firms with irreversible capital, high competition, or elevated risk. Furthermore, subsidiary‐siting analysis shows this decline is not offset by compensatory investment in other regions, indicating a substantive contraction in aggregate investment capacity rather than mere reallocation. A back‐of‐the‐envelope calculation estimates a cumulative aggregate investment loss of 4.378 billion RMB. Our findings highlight a significant trade‐off between ecological goals and indirect economic costs, offering critical insights for global biodiversity frameworks and sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Financial Management
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.70035
Primary Topic
Environmental Conservation and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Implicit Costs of Biodiversity Conservation: Evidence From Corporate Investment Distortion in China

Danni Kong, Wenhui Liu, Yihui Chen, Xu Cheng
Financial Management
Environmental Conservation and Management
article

The Implicit Costs of Biodiversity Conservation: Evidence From Corporate Investment Distortion in China

Danni Kong, Wenhui Liu, Yihui Chen, Xu Cheng
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examine the implicit costs of biodiversity conservation by exploiting China's Green Shield Action (GSA). Using a difference‐in‐differences approach, we find that firms in affected cities reduce investment rates by two percentage points, a 33.11% decline relative to the mean. This effect is driven by heightened local fiscal pressure—leading to tighter tax enforcement and subsidy cuts—and increased operational uncertainty. The impact is more pronounced for firms with irreversible capital, high competition, or elevated risk. Furthermore, subsidiary‐siting analysis shows this decline is not offset by compensatory investment in other regions, indicating a substantive contraction in aggregate investment capacity rather than mere reallocation. A back‐of‐the‐envelope calculation estimates a cumulative aggregate investment loss of 4.378 billion RMB. Our findings highlight a significant trade‐off between ecological goals and indirect economic costs, offering critical insights for global biodiversity frameworks and sustainable development.

Financial Management
Central South University (CN), Hunan University of Finance and Economics (CN), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Environmental Conservation and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Implicit Costs of Biodiversity Conservation: Evidence From Corporate Investment Distortion in China — Danni Kong, Wenhui Liu, et al. · Financial Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS