A Comparative Study on the Sustainable Remediation of Arsenic Pollution in Water and Soil Using Iron-Modified and Cerium-Modified Biochar

Arsenic (As) pollution has become a global concern, and the search for effective and sustainable As remediation methods has attracted much attention. Sustainable and cost-effective technologies for As remediation are essential to protect public health. This study aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), by transforming agricultural waste into value-added biochar for environmental remediation. Currently, studies on the remediation of As pollution using iron-modified biochar (Fe-BC) and cerium-modified biochar (Ce-BC) have demonstrated promising application potential. Although there is an established research foundation regarding their remediation performance and mechanisms, comparative studies evaluating their performance and mechanisms under unified experimental conditions remain limited. As in this study, Fe-BC and Ce-BC were prepared and systematically investigated. The As remediation performance and mechanisms of the two biochars were compared and analyzed through material characterization, aqueous adsorption experiments, and soil remediation assessments. The results showed that the specific surface areas of Fe-BC and Ce-BC were 94.380 m2·g−1 and 36.388 m2·g−1, respectively, both higher than that of the original biochar (BC). The Langmuir and Freundlich models adequately fitted the As adsorption processes of all three materials. Fe-BC and Ce-BC exhibited a tendency toward monolayer adsorption for As(III). The Freundlich distribution coefficient KF of Fe-BC was 0.1604, which was higher than that of BC and Ce-BC, indicating superior adsorption performance for As(III). In the pot experiment, when Fe-BC and Ce-BC were applied at 5%, the As content in ryegrass decreased by 78.38% and 77.15%, respectively. Fe-BC reduced the available As content in soil by 63.1% and decreased As accumulation in ryegrass by 78.38%. The reduction in available As content achieved by Fe-BC was greater than that achieved by Ce-BC. Fe(III) oxides supported on Fe-BC immobilized As through complexation and precipitation mechanisms. Fe0 and Fe3O4 in the materials altered the redox potential of the local microenvironment, affecting the transformation and stabilization of As species. Ce-BC primarily oxidized As(III) to As(V), and Ce4+ facilitated the formation of CeAsO4 precipitates due to its high redox potential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18062873
Primary Topic
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study on the Sustainable Remediation of Arsenic Pollution in Water and Soil Using Iron-Modified and Cerium-Modified Biochar

S Wang, Zhipu Wang, Shifeng Li, Shuzheng Guo et al.
Sustainability
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
article

A Comparative Study on the Sustainable Remediation of Arsenic Pollution in Water and Soil Using Iron-Modified and Cerium-Modified Biochar

S Wang, Zhipu Wang, Shifeng Li, Shuzheng Guo, X. Yuan, Shiji Bie, Yang Zhou
article en

Abstract

Arsenic (As) pollution has become a global concern, and the search for effective and sustainable As remediation methods has attracted much attention. Sustainable and cost-effective technologies for As remediation are essential to protect public health. This study aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), by transforming agricultural waste into value-added biochar for environmental remediation. Currently, studies on the remediation of As pollution using iron-modified biochar (Fe-BC) and cerium-modified biochar (Ce-BC) have demonstrated promising application potential. Although there is an established research foundation regarding their remediation performance and mechanisms, comparative studies evaluating their performance and mechanisms under unified experimental conditions remain limited. As in this study, Fe-BC and Ce-BC were prepared and systematically investigated. The As remediation performance and mechanisms of the two biochars were compared and analyzed through material characterization, aqueous adsorption experiments, and soil remediation assessments. The results showed that the specific surface areas of Fe-BC and Ce-BC were 94.380 m2·g−1 and 36.388 m2·g−1, respectively, both higher than that of the original biochar (BC). The Langmuir and Freundlich models adequately fitted the As adsorption processes of all three materials. Fe-BC and Ce-BC exhibited a tendency toward monolayer adsorption for As(III). The Freundlich distribution coefficient KF of Fe-BC was 0.1604, which was higher than that of BC and Ce-BC, indicating superior adsorption performance for As(III). In the pot experiment, when Fe-BC and Ce-BC were applied at 5%, the As content in ryegrass decreased by 78.38% and 77.15%, respectively. Fe-BC reduced the available As content in soil by 63.1% and decreased As accumulation in ryegrass by 78.38%. The reduction in available As content achieved by Fe-BC was greater than that achieved by Ce-BC. Fe(III) oxides supported on Fe-BC immobilized As through complexation and precipitation mechanisms. Fe0 and Fe3O4 in the materials altered the redox potential of the local microenvironment, affecting the transformation and stabilization of As species. Ce-BC primarily oxidized As(III) to As(V), and Ce4+ facilitated the formation of CeAsO4 precipitates due to its high redox potential.

SustainabilityVol. 18(6)
China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Arsenic contamination and mitigation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.