A Feasibility Study of Splintage by 3D Scanning and Printing: Process and Evaluation of Current 3D Printing Material

Three-dimensional (3D) scanning and printing technologies enable the production of personalized rehabilitation splints, yet challenges such as scanning artifacts in complex anatomical areas (e.g., finger webs), lengthy post-processing, long printing times, and material limitations (e.g., brittleness and poor breathability) hinder routine clinical adoption. This feasibility study developed and evaluated a clinician-accessible protocol for fabricating cock-up wrist splints using 3D scanning (Creaform GO!SCAN 50 with VXelements 4.1), modeling (Materialise Magics), and fused deposition modeling printing with polylactic acid (PLA) on a MakerBot Replicator+. Five healthy participants wore the splints for one week, with user satisfaction assessed via the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0; average total score 4.14/5, range 3.75-4.42) questionnaire. An experienced occupational therapist provided expert feedback. High satisfaction was reported for weight (4.6/5) and ease of use (4.6/5), confirming advantages over traditional thermoplastic splints in lightness and esthetics. However, lower scores for durability (3.6/5), comfort (3.6/5), and effectiveness (3.6/5) stemmed from PLA brittleness (cracking under load or overtightening), rough surfaces despite vapor polishing, inadequate ventilation causing moisture buildup, and fit issues (e.g., pressure points). Printing time averaged 9-19 h per splint. The protocol demonstrates proof-of-concept feasibility for clinicians with basic computer techniques, but material constraints and process refinements are required for reliable application in patient populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19061146
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Feasibility Study of Splintage by 3D Scanning and Printing: Process and Evaluation of Current 3D Printing Material

Kenneth N. K. Fong, Benson Wui-Man Lau, Sam Chi Chung Chan, Jackie Ngai-Man Chan et al.
Materials
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

A Feasibility Study of Splintage by 3D Scanning and Printing: Process and Evaluation of Current 3D Printing Material

Kenneth N. K. Fong, Benson Wui-Man Lau, Sam Chi Chung Chan, Jackie Ngai-Man Chan, Sze Wai Anson Li, Sze Wing Wong, Chung Man Joy Lau, Sze Wa Afra Mok, Bohao Yang
article en

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) scanning and printing technologies enable the production of personalized rehabilitation splints, yet challenges such as scanning artifacts in complex anatomical areas (e.g., finger webs), lengthy post-processing, long printing times, and material limitations (e.g., brittleness and poor breathability) hinder routine clinical adoption. This feasibility study developed and evaluated a clinician-accessible protocol for fabricating cock-up wrist splints using 3D scanning (Creaform GO!SCAN 50 with VXelements 4.1), modeling (Materialise Magics), and fused deposition modeling printing with polylactic acid (PLA) on a MakerBot Replicator+. Five healthy participants wore the splints for one week, with user satisfaction assessed via the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0; average total score 4.14/5, range 3.75-4.42) questionnaire. An experienced occupational therapist provided expert feedback. High satisfaction was reported for weight (4.6/5) and ease of use (4.6/5), confirming advantages over traditional thermoplastic splints in lightness and esthetics. However, lower scores for durability (3.6/5), comfort (3.6/5), and effectiveness (3.6/5) stemmed from PLA brittleness (cracking under load or overtightening), rough surfaces despite vapor polishing, inadequate ventilation causing moisture buildup, and fit issues (e.g., pressure points). Printing time averaged 9-19 h per splint. The protocol demonstrates proof-of-concept feasibility for clinicians with basic computer techniques, but material constraints and process refinements are required for reliable application in patient populations.

MaterialsVol. 19(6)
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Feasibility Study of Splintage by 3D Scanning and Printing: Process and Evaluation of Current 3D Printing Material — Kenneth N. K. Fong, Benson Wui-Man Lau, et al. · Materials (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS