Development and validation of an online predictive model for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in elderly patients

Objective To develop and validate a novel model for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) in elderly prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to create an accessible online tool for its clinical application. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent RP at two independent medical centers. The initial cohort included 450 patients (2015-2022), which were randomly divided into a training set (n = 315) and an internal validation set (n = 135) at a 7:3 ratio. An independent cohort of 175 patients (2013-2023) was used as the external validation set. Potential predictors were screened via univariable Cox regression. The independent prognostic factors for BCR were subsequently identified via multivariate Cox regression. A predictive nomogram was developed on the basis of these independent factors. The model performance was assessed via time-dependent ROC curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves. Results Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that Gleason score (GS), lymph node metastasis (LNM), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) were independent risk factors for BCR after RP in the elderly population (all P < 0.05). The nomogram exhibited excellent time-dependent discriminative ability: the AUCs for 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year BCR-free survival were 0.857, 0.915, and 0.916, respectively, in the training set; 0.810, 0.846, and 0.856, respectively, in the internal validation set; and 0.698, 0.679, and 0.715, respectively, in the external validation set. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between the predicted BCR risk and actual incidence, and DCA confirmed that the model provides substantial clinical net benefit. We further developed an online tool ( https://bcrnomapp.shinyapps.io/bcr-risk/ ) for personalized BCR-risk prediction. Conclusion We developed a validated nomogram based on four independent risk factors—the Gleason score, lymph node metastasis, seminal vesicle invasion, and free PSA—for predicting BCR in elderly prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. This model demonstrated robust predictive performance across multiple validation sets. The accompanying web-based tool facilitates rapid and individualized risk assessment, aiding in clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2026-03-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2026.1753318
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of an online predictive model for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in elderly patients

Xiaowei Wu, Yang Lv, Hao Tan, Jiayi Liu et al.
Frontiers in Oncology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Development and validation of an online predictive model for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in elderly patients

Xiaowei Wu, Yang Lv, Hao Tan, Jiayi Liu, Bangxin Xiao, Mingzhao Xiao, Fang Wu
article en

Abstract

Objective To develop and validate a novel model for predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) in elderly prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to create an accessible online tool for its clinical application. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent RP at two independent medical centers. The initial cohort included 450 patients (2015-2022), which were randomly divided into a training set (n = 315) and an internal validation set (n = 135) at a 7:3 ratio. An independent cohort of 175 patients (2013-2023) was used as the external validation set. Potential predictors were screened via univariable Cox regression. The independent prognostic factors for BCR were subsequently identified via multivariate Cox regression. A predictive nomogram was developed on the basis of these independent factors. The model performance was assessed via time-dependent ROC curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and Kaplan–Meier (KM) curves. Results Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that Gleason score (GS), lymph node metastasis (LNM), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) were independent risk factors for BCR after RP in the elderly population (all P < 0.05). The nomogram exhibited excellent time-dependent discriminative ability: the AUCs for 2-year, 3-year, and 5-year BCR-free survival were 0.857, 0.915, and 0.916, respectively, in the training set; 0.810, 0.846, and 0.856, respectively, in the internal validation set; and 0.698, 0.679, and 0.715, respectively, in the external validation set. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between the predicted BCR risk and actual incidence, and DCA confirmed that the model provides substantial clinical net benefit. We further developed an online tool ( https://bcrnomapp.shinyapps.io/bcr-risk/ ) for personalized BCR-risk prediction. Conclusion We developed a validated nomogram based on four independent risk factors—the Gleason score, lymph node metastasis, seminal vesicle invasion, and free PSA—for predicting BCR in elderly prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy. This model demonstrated robust predictive performance across multiple validation sets. The accompanying web-based tool facilitates rapid and individualized risk assessment, aiding in clinical decision-making.

Frontiers in OncologyVol. 16
Chongqing University (CN), The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Public Health Medical Center (CN), Chongqing Cancer Hospital (CN), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.