Uncertainty and Risk at the Point of Care:Implications of Patient-Generated ECGs and Algorithmic Interpretations for Clinical Decision Making

Wearables enable users to generate electrocardiogram (ECG) data and receive algorithmic rhythm interpretations. While cardiologists increasingly use this data, little is known about how point-of-care clinicians perceive and anticipate using it. These clinicians are the main point of contact for many patients and determine access to further investigations and specialists. We conducted vignette-based interviews with 33 primary and emergency care clinicians to explore how they make sense of patient-generated ECG data and which factors shape anticipated use in decision making. We found that patient-generated data introduces diagnostic uncertainty, shaped by: legitimacy concerns, interpretation challenges, the influence of the wider clinical context on trust and confidence, and the balancing of patient risk against professional risk. This duality of risk often overrode earlier considerations, determining how clinicians responded to patient-generated data. We discuss design opportunities for uncertainty and risk-aware technology that can support the adoption of patient-generated data in everyday clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Published
2026-03-02
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty and Risk at the Point of Care:Implications of Patient-Generated ECGs and Algorithmic Interpretations for Clinical Decision Making

Rachel Keys, Aisling Ann O'Kane, Paul Marshall, A Graham Stuart
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Uncertainty and Risk at the Point of Care:Implications of Patient-Generated ECGs and Algorithmic Interpretations for Clinical Decision Making

Rachel Keys, Aisling Ann O'Kane, Paul Marshall, A Graham Stuart
article en

Abstract

Wearables enable users to generate electrocardiogram (ECG) data and receive algorithmic rhythm interpretations. While cardiologists increasingly use this data, little is known about how point-of-care clinicians perceive and anticipate using it. These clinicians are the main point of contact for many patients and determine access to further investigations and specialists. We conducted vignette-based interviews with 33 primary and emergency care clinicians to explore how they make sense of patient-generated ECG data and which factors shape anticipated use in decision making. We found that patient-generated data introduces diagnostic uncertainty, shaped by: legitimacy concerns, interpretation challenges, the influence of the wider clinical context on trust and confidence, and the balancing of patient risk against professional risk. This duality of risk often overrode earlier considerations, determining how clinicians responded to patient-generated data. We discuss design opportunities for uncertainty and risk-aware technology that can support the adoption of patient-generated data in everyday clinical practice.

Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uncertainty and Risk at the Point of Care:Implications of Patient-Generated ECGs and Algorithmic Interpretations for Clinical Decision Making — Rachel Keys, Aisling Ann O'Kane, et al. · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS