Recycling fossil infrastructure for cleaner energy transitions

The climate crisis mandates building renewable energy infrastructure faster, increasing the demand for primary materials with large environmental footprints. Sourcing these materials from urban mines can mitigate such impacts, but the potential of recycling depends on waste availability. Here, we use life cycle assessment and monetization of impacts to explore the environmental implications of recycling fossil infrastructure that may become obsolete during the transition. We find that among many materials in fossil infrastructure, recycling steel and copper is particularly appealing, as their stocks (1.34 gigatons and 10.03 megatons) align with the projected energy transition demands (145% and 32% of median demand between 2020-2050, respectively). Recycling steel and copper in fossil infrastructure could save up to 1.95 gigatons CO<sub>2,eq</sub> and 11.69 trillion US Dollars in externality costs until 2050, while remaining competitive considering current production methods. Using recycled steel and copper would also reduce the carbon footprint of energy transition technologies-for example, wind and photovoltaic power-by one third.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70777-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Extraction and Separation Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recycling fossil infrastructure for cleaner energy transitions

Harald Desing, Hauke Schlesier, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez
1 citations
Nature Communications
Extraction and Separation Processes
19.05
article

Recycling fossil infrastructure for cleaner energy transitions

Harald Desing, Hauke Schlesier, Gonzalo Guillén-Gosálbez
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The climate crisis mandates building renewable energy infrastructure faster, increasing the demand for primary materials with large environmental footprints. Sourcing these materials from urban mines can mitigate such impacts, but the potential of recycling depends on waste availability. Here, we use life cycle assessment and monetization of impacts to explore the environmental implications of recycling fossil infrastructure that may become obsolete during the transition. We find that among many materials in fossil infrastructure, recycling steel and copper is particularly appealing, as their stocks (1.34 gigatons and 10.03 megatons) align with the projected energy transition demands (145% and 32% of median demand between 2020-2050, respectively). Recycling steel and copper in fossil infrastructure could save up to 1.95 gigatons CO<sub>2,eq</sub> and 11.69 trillion US Dollars in externality costs until 2050, while remaining competitive considering current production methods. Using recycled steel and copper would also reduce the carbon footprint of energy transition technologies-for example, wind and photovoltaic power-by one third.

Nature Communications
ETH Zurich (CH), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme, Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Extraction and Separation Processes
19.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.