Differences in corneal biomechanical parameters in normal tension glaucoma versus normotensive glaucoma suspect eyes

Abstract Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate differences in corneal biomechanical parameters provided by Corvis ST to segregate those with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) from glaucoma suspects. We included only newly diagnosed and treatment naïve glaucoma patients. Several corneal biomechanical parameters provided by Corvis ST were investigated. The discrimination ability of BGF was investigated through the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). We included a total of 200 eyes from 100 patients with NTG and 200 eyes from 100 controls. We found statistical difference in Corneal velocity at second applanation (A2) with − 0.264 ± 0.061 m/s (OD) and − 0.270 ± 0.067 m/s (OS) in the control group, versus − 0.226 ± 0.084 m/s (OD, p = 0.0004) and − 0.223 ± 0.079 m/s (OS, p = 0.0001) in the NTG group. In addition, we found statistical difference in biomechanical glaucoma factor (BGF) between groups, with 0.568 ± 0.239 (OD) and 0.560 ± 0.229 (OS) in the control group, versus 0.674 ± 0.212 (OD, p = 0.001) and 0.659 ± 0.231 (OS, p = 0.056) in the NTG group. The AUC value was 0.63 BGF for discriminating NTG eyes from normal eyes. Both BGF and corneal velocity at second applanation were statistically different between groups. Using BGF parameter from Corvis ST can improve diagnostic accuracy when dealing with NTG.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-70393-w
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Differences in corneal biomechanical parameters in normal tension glaucoma versus normotensive glaucoma suspect eyes

Ricardo Y. Abe, M.A. Macêdo, Jayter Silva Paula, Tiago S. Prata et al.
Scientific Reports
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Differences in corneal biomechanical parameters in normal tension glaucoma versus normotensive glaucoma suspect eyes

Ricardo Y. Abe, M.A. Macêdo, Jayter Silva Paula, Tiago S. Prata, Wilson Takashi Hida, Isabela C. T. Araujo, Eduardo J. R. Garbeloti
article en

Abstract

Abstract Multicenter retrospective study to evaluate differences in corneal biomechanical parameters provided by Corvis ST to segregate those with normal tension glaucoma (NTG) from glaucoma suspects. We included only newly diagnosed and treatment naïve glaucoma patients. Several corneal biomechanical parameters provided by Corvis ST were investigated. The discrimination ability of BGF was investigated through the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). We included a total of 200 eyes from 100 patients with NTG and 200 eyes from 100 controls. We found statistical difference in Corneal velocity at second applanation (A2) with − 0.264 ± 0.061 m/s (OD) and − 0.270 ± 0.067 m/s (OS) in the control group, versus − 0.226 ± 0.084 m/s (OD, p = 0.0004) and − 0.223 ± 0.079 m/s (OS, p = 0.0001) in the NTG group. In addition, we found statistical difference in biomechanical glaucoma factor (BGF) between groups, with 0.568 ± 0.239 (OD) and 0.560 ± 0.229 (OS) in the control group, versus 0.674 ± 0.212 (OD, p = 0.001) and 0.659 ± 0.231 (OS, p = 0.056) in the NTG group. The AUC value was 0.63 BGF for discriminating NTG eyes from normal eyes. Both BGF and corneal velocity at second applanation were statistically different between groups. Using BGF parameter from Corvis ST can improve diagnostic accuracy when dealing with NTG.

Scientific Reports
Universidade de Ribeirão Preto (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR), Hospital Oftalmologico de Brasília (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.