FROM NATURALIST TO BUREAUCRAT : THE TRANSFORMATION OF FOREST KNOWLEDGE IN LATE-19TH CENTURY TRAVANCORE

This article examines the epistemic transformation of forest knowledge in the princely state of Travancore during the late nineteenth century through the figure of T. F. Bourdillon, Conservator of Forests and author of the Report on the Forests of Travancore (1892). Moving beyond his training as a naturalist in the British imperial scientific tradition, Bourdillon's work signals a crucial shift from descriptive natural history to a calculative, bureaucratic science of resource management. His Report replete with classifications, tables, yield estimates, and prescriptions for working plans marks the institutionalization of what may be termed a bureaucratic ecology: a system in which forest knowledge was standardized, quantified, and subordinated to the rationalities of governance and economic productivity. By reading the Report alongside the wider discourse of imperial forestry, especially the models promoted by Brandis and the Indian Forest Department, this article argues that Bourdillon's Travancorean project exemplifies how colonial science became an instrument of administrative modernity. Through textual and archival analysis, it explores how the language of “scientific forestry” reconfigured the forest from an organic landscape of biodiversity into an abstract space of measurement, legality, and profit. The essay situates this transformation within the broader history of colonial knowledge, tracing how the naturalist's empirical gaze was retooled into the bureaucrat's managerial vision-an epistemic shift that underwrote the making of “productive forests” and laid the groundwork for twentieth-century technocratic environmentalism in South India.