Modulation of feedback-related negativity by objective and subjective response correctness

Monitoring actions and outcomes is essential for flexible adaptation to environmental demands. Information about errors is important regardless of whether it is internally generated or externally signaled. Following incorrect responses, an event-related potential (ERP) component known as error-related negativity (ERN) appears in electroencephalographic (EEG) signals and reflects activity of the performance monitoring system located in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC). Another ERP component associated with performance monitoring, feedback-related negativity (FRN), has been shown to process feedback stimuli related to performance errors. However, unlike the ERN, which is elicited by errors that may not reach conscious awareness, it remains unclear whether the FRN is modulated by unconsciously perceived errors. To examine modulation of the FRN by objective and subjective response correctness, EEG was recorded from 28 participants performing a digit-entering task that included trials with false feedback. Single-trial EEG analysis using linear mixed-effects models revealed that FRN amplitudes were modulated by objective response correctness after controlling for subjective reports of error certainty. Response time in the subsequent trial was also influenced by objective correctness, although no behavioral measure fully aligned with ERN or FRN patterns. These findings suggest a common representation of objective correctness in response- and feedback-related pMFC activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43451-6
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modulation of feedback-related negativity by objective and subjective response correctness

Osamu Fukayama, Keita Aoyama, Yasuhisa Maruyama
Scientific Reports
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Modulation of feedback-related negativity by objective and subjective response correctness

Osamu Fukayama, Keita Aoyama, Yasuhisa Maruyama
article en

Abstract

Monitoring actions and outcomes is essential for flexible adaptation to environmental demands. Information about errors is important regardless of whether it is internally generated or externally signaled. Following incorrect responses, an event-related potential (ERP) component known as error-related negativity (ERN) appears in electroencephalographic (EEG) signals and reflects activity of the performance monitoring system located in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC). Another ERP component associated with performance monitoring, feedback-related negativity (FRN), has been shown to process feedback stimuli related to performance errors. However, unlike the ERN, which is elicited by errors that may not reach conscious awareness, it remains unclear whether the FRN is modulated by unconsciously perceived errors. To examine modulation of the FRN by objective and subjective response correctness, EEG was recorded from 28 participants performing a digit-entering task that included trials with false feedback. Single-trial EEG analysis using linear mixed-effects models revealed that FRN amplitudes were modulated by objective response correctness after controlling for subjective reports of error certainty. Response time in the subsequent trial was also influenced by objective correctness, although no behavioral measure fully aligned with ERN or FRN patterns. These findings suggest a common representation of objective correctness in response- and feedback-related pMFC activity.

Scientific Reports
Nagoya Institute of Technology (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP), National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.