Outcomes of Septal Versus Non‐Septal Right Ventricular Pacemaker Leads as Adjudicated by CT Imaging
Septal pacing was associated with preservation of left ventricular function compared to non-septal pacing, although this advantage did not translate to improved clinical outcomes. Septal pacing may help to reduce pacing-induced ventricular dysfunction when conduction system pacing is not feasible.
Authors
- Márcio Sommer Bittencourt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3711-1754)
- Konstantinos N. Aronis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7189-8434)
- Emma C. Osterhaus
- Samir Saba (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4669-803X)
- Krishna Kancharla (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2550-9359)
- Aditya Bhonsale (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-5977)
- Jianhui Zhu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-0121)
- Alaa Shalaby
- Sandeep K. Jain
- Andrew Voigt
- Deepak Kumar
- Mark N. A. Estes
Institutions
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
- Johns Hopkins Hospital (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Published
- 2026-03-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70307
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00