Remote Warfare: Drone Technology and the Dehumanisation of Conflict

Drone warfare introduces a profound transformation in the relationship between combatants, technology, and the battlefield. Unlike conventional forms of warfare, drone operations allow military personnel to conduct surveillance and lethal strikes from locations far removed from the physical theatre of conflict. This article examines how the increasing reliance on unmanned aerial systems contributes to the dehumanisation of warfare, altering both the psychological experience of operators and the ethical frameworks governing the use of force. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature in security studies, philosophy, and international humanitarian law, the article explores how remote warfare reshapes moral responsibility, risk distribution, and perceptions of violence. Particular attention is given to the implications of persistent aerial surveillance and the mediation of combat through screens and digital interfaces. The analysis argues that drone warfare creates asymmetrical conditions in which one side experiences combat as remote technological management while the other confronts an unseen and impersonal adversary. T hese dynamics raise significant challenges for existing ethical and legal frameworks regulating armed conflict, particularly in contexts where attribution, accountability, and civilian protection remain difficult to ensure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19028984
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Remote Warfare: Drone Technology and the Dehumanisation of Conflict

Johan G.L. Verheyden
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Remote Warfare: Drone Technology and the Dehumanisation of Conflict

Johan G.L. Verheyden
article en

Abstract

Drone warfare introduces a profound transformation in the relationship between combatants, technology, and the battlefield. Unlike conventional forms of warfare, drone operations allow military personnel to conduct surveillance and lethal strikes from locations far removed from the physical theatre of conflict. This article examines how the increasing reliance on unmanned aerial systems contributes to the dehumanisation of warfare, altering both the psychological experience of operators and the ethical frameworks governing the use of force. Drawing on interdisciplinary literature in security studies, philosophy, and international humanitarian law, the article explores how remote warfare reshapes moral responsibility, risk distribution, and perceptions of violence. Particular attention is given to the implications of persistent aerial surveillance and the mediation of combat through screens and digital interfaces. The analysis argues that drone warfare creates asymmetrical conditions in which one side experiences combat as remote technological management while the other confronts an unseen and impersonal adversary. T hese dynamics raise significant challenges for existing ethical and legal frameworks regulating armed conflict, particularly in contexts where attribution, accountability, and civilian protection remain difficult to ensure.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Elabora Consultoria (Brazil) (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.