College Men’s Propensity for Sexual Aggression and Perceived Justifications for Sexual Aggression Toward a Heterosexual or Bisexual College Woman

Bisexual women are twice as likely to report sexual assault (SA) as heterosexual women (Seabrook et al., 2018). Research is needed to examine whether men's perceptions of bisexual women's sexual interest and behavior differ relative to perceptions of heterosexual women, as such perceptions are relevant to the decision-making processes of sexually aggressive men. This study examined whether constructs used in sexual aggression models were associated with greater perceived sexual availability and justifications for SA of a bisexual woman relative to a heterosexual woman. Participants were heterosexual undergraduate men (<i>n</i> = 118) who read a hypothetical vignette in which the sexual orientation of the woman described was manipulated (i.e., bisexual or heterosexual) and rated items that assessed justification for sexual aggression and judgments of the woman's behavior (e.g., her sexual interest, her resistance to sexual advances, her behavior as inappropriate or unladylike, her promiscuity). Hierarchical linear regressions were used for the analyses. Sexual dominance was associated positively with men's justifications for sexual aggression. As impersonal sex increased, negative blindness (e.g., a hypothesized deficit in accurate perception of women's negative behavioral cues) increased in the bisexual condition only. Rape myth acceptance (RMA) was associated with greater negative blindness in both conditions, with a steeper slope in the bisexual condition. Additionally, RMA was associated with greater sexual availability in both conditions, with a steeper slope in the bisexual condition. Hostility toward women was also associated with greater judgments of sexual availability in both conditions, with similar slopes across conditions. These findings suggest that particular traits associated with sexual aggression may predispose men to misperceive cues of bisexual women's sexual disinterest and judge bisexual women as more sexually available relative to heterosexual women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261419459
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

College Men’s Propensity for Sexual Aggression and Perceived Justifications for Sexual Aggression Toward a Heterosexual or Bisexual College Woman

Alexis Sheffield, Elizabeth A. Yeater
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

College Men’s Propensity for Sexual Aggression and Perceived Justifications for Sexual Aggression Toward a Heterosexual or Bisexual College Woman

Alexis Sheffield, Elizabeth A. Yeater
article en

Abstract

Bisexual women are twice as likely to report sexual assault (SA) as heterosexual women (Seabrook et al., 2018). Research is needed to examine whether men's perceptions of bisexual women's sexual interest and behavior differ relative to perceptions of heterosexual women, as such perceptions are relevant to the decision-making processes of sexually aggressive men. This study examined whether constructs used in sexual aggression models were associated with greater perceived sexual availability and justifications for SA of a bisexual woman relative to a heterosexual woman. Participants were heterosexual undergraduate men (<i>n</i> = 118) who read a hypothetical vignette in which the sexual orientation of the woman described was manipulated (i.e., bisexual or heterosexual) and rated items that assessed justification for sexual aggression and judgments of the woman's behavior (e.g., her sexual interest, her resistance to sexual advances, her behavior as inappropriate or unladylike, her promiscuity). Hierarchical linear regressions were used for the analyses. Sexual dominance was associated positively with men's justifications for sexual aggression. As impersonal sex increased, negative blindness (e.g., a hypothesized deficit in accurate perception of women's negative behavioral cues) increased in the bisexual condition only. Rape myth acceptance (RMA) was associated with greater negative blindness in both conditions, with a steeper slope in the bisexual condition. Additionally, RMA was associated with greater sexual availability in both conditions, with a steeper slope in the bisexual condition. Hostility toward women was also associated with greater judgments of sexual availability in both conditions, with similar slopes across conditions. These findings suggest that particular traits associated with sexual aggression may predispose men to misperceive cues of bisexual women's sexual disinterest and judge bisexual women as more sexually available relative to heterosexual women.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
University of New Mexico (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.