Beyond substitution: How virtual representations stabilize operational paradoxes in new product development

Virtualization technologies—digital twins and virtual prototyping—are widely promoted as efficiency levers in new product development, yet we know little about how increasingly central virtual representations reorganize prototyping work over time and how ensuing contradictions become workable. We address this gap through a longitudinal case study of ALPHA, a luxury fashion engineering firm, tracing its virtualization trajectory (2015–2024) via 53 interviews plus archival and internal documents. Virtualization did not converge toward full digital substitution. As virtual representations became coordination hubs, three interdependent tensions persisted: optimization versus physicality, digital expertise versus craft knowledge, and collaboration intensification versus digital dependence. We theorize these as stable and habitable operational paradoxes—contradictory yet mutually enabling demands embedded in everyday prototyping work—stabilized through socio-technical configuration rather than cyclical reframing. We identify three stabilization mechanisms: interdependent representational architectures coupling physical prototypes with 2D/3D artefacts; epistemic authority that governs the enactment of digital competences while preserving craft-based evaluative closure; and partitioned discretion that combines traceability-critical digital workflows with bounded flexibility near material validation. We translate these insights into a diagnose–design–govern roadmap for building hybrid prototyping systems that accelerate iteration without displacing embodied expertise or inducing disabling rigidity . • Virtual representations become coordination hubs, yet do not replace prototypes. • Three tensions: optimization–physicality; digital–craft; collaboration–dependence. • Paradoxes remain workable via socio-technical stabilization, not cyclical reframing. • Mechanisms: interdependent artefacts, epistemic authority, partitioned discretion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Production Economics
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2026.110006
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond substitution: How virtual representations stabilize operational paradoxes in new product development

Paolo Neirotti, Danilo Pesce, Gabriele Aimonino
International Journal of Production Economics
Design Education and Practice
article

Beyond substitution: How virtual representations stabilize operational paradoxes in new product development

Paolo Neirotti, Danilo Pesce, Gabriele Aimonino
article en

Abstract

Virtualization technologies—digital twins and virtual prototyping—are widely promoted as efficiency levers in new product development, yet we know little about how increasingly central virtual representations reorganize prototyping work over time and how ensuing contradictions become workable. We address this gap through a longitudinal case study of ALPHA, a luxury fashion engineering firm, tracing its virtualization trajectory (2015–2024) via 53 interviews plus archival and internal documents. Virtualization did not converge toward full digital substitution. As virtual representations became coordination hubs, three interdependent tensions persisted: optimization versus physicality, digital expertise versus craft knowledge, and collaboration intensification versus digital dependence. We theorize these as stable and habitable operational paradoxes—contradictory yet mutually enabling demands embedded in everyday prototyping work—stabilized through socio-technical configuration rather than cyclical reframing. We identify three stabilization mechanisms: interdependent representational architectures coupling physical prototypes with 2D/3D artefacts; epistemic authority that governs the enactment of digital competences while preserving craft-based evaluative closure; and partitioned discretion that combines traceability-critical digital workflows with bounded flexibility near material validation. We translate these insights into a diagnose–design–govern roadmap for building hybrid prototyping systems that accelerate iteration without displacing embodied expertise or inducing disabling rigidity . • Virtual representations become coordination hubs, yet do not replace prototypes. • Three tensions: optimization–physicality; digital–craft; collaboration–dependence. • Paradoxes remain workable via socio-technical stabilization, not cyclical reframing. • Mechanisms: interdependent artefacts, epistemic authority, partitioned discretion.

International Journal of Production EconomicsVol. 297
Politecnico di Torino (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.