A comparative study on the preparation of 316L stainless steel via additive manufacturing and vacuum arc melting

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers unique capabilities for producing high-performance alloys with refined microstructures. Here, 316L stainless steels fabricated by AM and conventional vacuum arc melting (VAM) were systematically compared in terms of microstructure, defects, and mechanical response. The AM steel exhibited a 49% increase in hardness and a 29% improvement in ultimate tensile strength relative to the VAM steel, while its defect volume fraction was reduced to one-third. Both processing routes generated Si–Mn–O inclusions; however, the AM material uniquely contained a high density of nanoscale second-phase particles that contributed to strengthening. Thermodynamic modeling (FactSage) and molten pool simulations (ProCAST) revealed the role of rapid solidification and thermal gradients in promoting nanoscale precipitation and defect mitigation in AM. These findings demonstrate that AM not only tailors defect characteristics but also enables microstructural refinement, thereby offering a pathway to superior mechanical performance compared with conventional melting techniques.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2026.03.146
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study on the preparation of 316L stainless steel via additive manufacturing and vacuum arc melting

linzhu wang, Yueliang Yu, Xing Ran, Junqi Li et al.
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

A comparative study on the preparation of 316L stainless steel via additive manufacturing and vacuum arc melting

linzhu wang, Yueliang Yu, Xing Ran, Junqi Li, Mei He, Xiang Li, Chaoyi Chen, Junfei Huang, Jun Wang
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers unique capabilities for producing high-performance alloys with refined microstructures. Here, 316L stainless steels fabricated by AM and conventional vacuum arc melting (VAM) were systematically compared in terms of microstructure, defects, and mechanical response. The AM steel exhibited a 49% increase in hardness and a 29% improvement in ultimate tensile strength relative to the VAM steel, while its defect volume fraction was reduced to one-third. Both processing routes generated Si–Mn–O inclusions; however, the AM material uniquely contained a high density of nanoscale second-phase particles that contributed to strengthening. Thermodynamic modeling (FactSage) and molten pool simulations (ProCAST) revealed the role of rapid solidification and thermal gradients in promoting nanoscale precipitation and defect mitigation in AM. These findings demonstrate that AM not only tailors defect characteristics but also enables microstructural refinement, thereby offering a pathway to superior mechanical performance compared with conventional melting techniques.

Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyVol. 42
Guizhou University (CN), Shimadzu (China) (CN), AviChina Industry & Technology (China) (CN), Guizhou Institute of Technology (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.