AI Reliability Programme — Empirical Study 1: Architectural Phase Transition Governs AI Reliability Beyond the Single-Agent Ceiling (Pandit et al., 2026)

This preprint reports results from 4,680 controlled evaluations across six frontier AI models, four experimental scenarios, six mathematical reasoning domains, and 90 contamination-minimised, formally verifiable problems. The central finding is an architectural phase transition in AI reliability: above approximately 95% accuracy, error structure undergoes a qualitative shift from stochastic to systematic, at which point compute scaling becomes fundamentally ineffective. The Generator–Auditor–Adversary–Synthesizer (GAAS) architecture breaks the single-agent ceiling: single-agent inference plateaus at 93.0%; self-consistency scaling yields only +1.5 pp (p=0.317, NS); role-separated GAAS achieves 98.7% (p<0.001); role-specialised model diversity achieves 100% on this evaluation set (Wilson CI: 95.9–100%). This is Empirical Study 1 of a planned three-study programme. Study 1 covers determinate domains (mathematical and logical reasoning). Studies 2 and 3 will extend to semi-determinate and indeterminate domains. Files included:- Main manuscript (PDF)- Online Appendix 1: All 90 evaluation questions, verified ground-truth answers, complete raw model responses for S1–S4, error taxonomy classifications, and experimental protocols (DOCX)

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19036413
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Reliability Programme — Empirical Study 1: Architectural Phase Transition Governs AI Reliability Beyond the Single-Agent Ceiling (Pandit et al., 2026)

Kuldeep Kumar Pandit, Vatsala Pandit, Aayan Pandit
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Reliability Programme — Empirical Study 1: Architectural Phase Transition Governs AI Reliability Beyond the Single-Agent Ceiling (Pandit et al., 2026)

Kuldeep Kumar Pandit, Vatsala Pandit, Aayan Pandit
article en

Abstract

This preprint reports results from 4,680 controlled evaluations across six frontier AI models, four experimental scenarios, six mathematical reasoning domains, and 90 contamination-minimised, formally verifiable problems. The central finding is an architectural phase transition in AI reliability: above approximately 95% accuracy, error structure undergoes a qualitative shift from stochastic to systematic, at which point compute scaling becomes fundamentally ineffective. The Generator–Auditor–Adversary–Synthesizer (GAAS) architecture breaks the single-agent ceiling: single-agent inference plateaus at 93.0%; self-consistency scaling yields only +1.5 pp (p=0.317, NS); role-separated GAAS achieves 98.7% (p<0.001); role-specialised model diversity achieves 100% on this evaluation set (Wilson CI: 95.9–100%). This is Empirical Study 1 of a planned three-study programme. Study 1 covers determinate domains (mathematical and logical reasoning). Studies 2 and 3 will extend to semi-determinate and indeterminate domains. Files included:- Main manuscript (PDF)- Online Appendix 1: All 90 evaluation questions, verified ground-truth answers, complete raw model responses for S1–S4, error taxonomy classifications, and experimental protocols (DOCX)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.