Journalism conferences as symbolic power: in/visibility trends across speaker lists of the Global Investigative Journalism Conference (2019–2023)

Purpose Journalism is cited as a profession that has under-represented people of colour in management, necessitating enquiry into other areas of (mis)representation. This study relies on Bourdieu's field theory to ascertain who is (in)visible and which “bodies” are defining the field. It proposes a “conference power” framework for exploring these professional events as platforms where capital accumulates and influence proliferates. Design/methodology/approach The data were publicly available speaker lists from the Global Investigative Journalism Conference: the world's largest gathering of investigative reporters. The in-person 2019 event, the online 2021 event and the post-COVID 2023 event were analysed for race, gender, session duration and session type trends. The US Census Bureau's categories were used as codes. Hand-coding prioritised self-reported ethnicity and gender, preventing errors from algorithmic inability to assess names beginning with initials and binary labelling. Findings Women were dominant as moderators but had lower visibility in major field-shaping categories: academic and data journalism sessions. White speakers accounted for the majority of all appearances. These trends persisted across online and in-person conferences and may constitute “symbolic violence” whilst contributing to socio-communicative precarity. To improve, a periodic audit of conference speaker data and rotation of under-represented groups across organising committees should be undertaken. Originality/value Conceptualising “conference power” using organisational and field theory contributes to scholarly understanding of conferences as arenas for the production, appropriation and barter of prestige goods that accumulate into power at work. Bracketing case studies from one conference and detailed speaker identification methods also provide pathways for assessing field control using speaker lists and session types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Event and Festival Management
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijefm-08-2025-0118
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Journalism conferences as symbolic power: in/visibility trends across speaker lists of the Global Investigative Journalism Conference (2019–2023)

Ruona Meyer
International Journal of Event and Festival Management
Media Studies and Communication
article

Journalism conferences as symbolic power: in/visibility trends across speaker lists of the Global Investigative Journalism Conference (2019–2023)

Ruona Meyer
article en

Abstract

Purpose Journalism is cited as a profession that has under-represented people of colour in management, necessitating enquiry into other areas of (mis)representation. This study relies on Bourdieu's field theory to ascertain who is (in)visible and which “bodies” are defining the field. It proposes a “conference power” framework for exploring these professional events as platforms where capital accumulates and influence proliferates. Design/methodology/approach The data were publicly available speaker lists from the Global Investigative Journalism Conference: the world's largest gathering of investigative reporters. The in-person 2019 event, the online 2021 event and the post-COVID 2023 event were analysed for race, gender, session duration and session type trends. The US Census Bureau's categories were used as codes. Hand-coding prioritised self-reported ethnicity and gender, preventing errors from algorithmic inability to assess names beginning with initials and binary labelling. Findings Women were dominant as moderators but had lower visibility in major field-shaping categories: academic and data journalism sessions. White speakers accounted for the majority of all appearances. These trends persisted across online and in-person conferences and may constitute “symbolic violence” whilst contributing to socio-communicative precarity. To improve, a periodic audit of conference speaker data and rotation of under-represented groups across organising committees should be undertaken. Originality/value Conceptualising “conference power” using organisational and field theory contributes to scholarly understanding of conferences as arenas for the production, appropriation and barter of prestige goods that accumulate into power at work. Bracketing case studies from one conference and detailed speaker identification methods also provide pathways for assessing field control using speaker lists and session types.

International Journal of Event and Festival Management
Faculty of Media (SI)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.