Real‐world effectiveness and safety with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in patients with or without melanoma brain metastasis: Results from the German noninterventional <scp>NICO</scp> study

The prospective, German NICO study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02990611) evaluated real-world effectiveness and safety with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone (any-line) in patients with advanced melanoma with/without melanoma brain metastasis (MBM). A total of 755 patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 486; median follow-up, 46.8 months) or nivolumab alone (n = 269; median follow-up, 38.7 months) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics differed between the treatment groups, with the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group being younger and having poorer prognostic factors. At baseline, 221 patients (29.3%) had MBM, among whom 15 patients had symptomatic MBM based on dexamethasone use. In patients with/without MBM receiving first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab, objective response rates (ORRs) were 46.2% and 54.0%, respectively; 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 34.0% and 47.0%. In patients with/without MBM receiving first-line nivolumab alone, ORRs were 61.5% and 55.1%, respectively; 3-year OS rates were 42.7% and 47.8%. In a 3-month landmark analysis, patients with MBM with a complete/partial response demonstrated 3-year OS rates of 71.9% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 89.6% with nivolumab alone. Three-year OS rates were 42.2% and 20.0% with asymptomatic and symptomatic MBM, respectively. There were no substantial differences in the rates of serious grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events between patients with/without MBM. HRQoL was stable. Results from this real-world study show that a substantial proportion of patients with MBM derive long-term benefit from nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone, particularly those with asymptomatic MBM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Cancer
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.70440
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real‐world effectiveness and safety with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in patients with or without melanoma brain metastasis: Results from the German noninterventional NICO study

Carsten Weishaupt, Ralf Gutzmer, Christoffer Gebhardt, Thomas Sickmann et al.
International Journal of Cancer
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Real‐world effectiveness and safety with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in patients with or without melanoma brain metastasis: Results from the German noninterventional NICO study

Carsten Weishaupt, Ralf Gutzmer, Christoffer Gebhardt, Thomas Sickmann, Michael Weichenthal, Thomas Eigentler, Anca Sindrilaru, P. Dücker, Jens Ulrich, Selma Ugurel, Katharina C. Kähler, Patrick Terheyden, Sebastian Haferkamp, Friedegund Meier, Jochen Utikal, Peter Mohr, Claudia Pföhler, Dirk Schadendorf, Imke von Wasielewski
article en

Abstract

The prospective, German NICO study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02990611) evaluated real-world effectiveness and safety with nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone (any-line) in patients with advanced melanoma with/without melanoma brain metastasis (MBM). A total of 755 patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 486; median follow-up, 46.8 months) or nivolumab alone (n = 269; median follow-up, 38.7 months) were enrolled. Baseline characteristics differed between the treatment groups, with the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group being younger and having poorer prognostic factors. At baseline, 221 patients (29.3%) had MBM, among whom 15 patients had symptomatic MBM based on dexamethasone use. In patients with/without MBM receiving first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab, objective response rates (ORRs) were 46.2% and 54.0%, respectively; 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 34.0% and 47.0%. In patients with/without MBM receiving first-line nivolumab alone, ORRs were 61.5% and 55.1%, respectively; 3-year OS rates were 42.7% and 47.8%. In a 3-month landmark analysis, patients with MBM with a complete/partial response demonstrated 3-year OS rates of 71.9% with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 89.6% with nivolumab alone. Three-year OS rates were 42.2% and 20.0% with asymptomatic and symptomatic MBM, respectively. There were no substantial differences in the rates of serious grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events between patients with/without MBM. HRQoL was stable. Results from this real-world study show that a substantial proportion of patients with MBM derive long-term benefit from nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone, particularly those with asymptomatic MBM.

International Journal of Cancer
Bristol-Myers Squibb (Germany) (DE), Universität Hamburg (DE), German Cancer Research Center (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Luther University (KR), Dorothea Dix Hospital (US), Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), University Hospital Münster (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE), Klinikum Dortmund (DE), Klinikum Bielefeld (DE), Elbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude (DE), University Hospital Ulm (DE), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE), University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE), Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE), Saarland University (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.