Human Security and digital transformation of governance in development contexts

Across the policy life-cycle and a range of policy areas AI is driving innovation and has come to represent a technological paradigm shift in the public sector through its growing role in public service decision-making and delivery, at a time of increasingly complex and interconnected challenges for human security, public policy and state capacity (Misuraca &amp; van Noordt, 2020). This large-scale and rapid role of foundation models, large language models and generative AI has been accompanied by substantial research considering their potential impacts across societies and highlighting the complex issues for law, policy and practice it presents (Zuiderwijk et al., 2021). This paper seeks to contribute to debates by drawing together the connections between human security, the policy cycle, and AI and governance innovation in the public sector to explore the diverse challenges and opportunities in a development context. <br/>Economic, infrastructure and educational disparities (Aderibigbe et al., 2023) as well as power asymmetries, the digital divide and AI colonialism and technological dependency (Regilme, 2025) have all been highlighted as dynamics that can impact the wider adoption of and governance innovation in AI in diverse developing socio-economic contexts as well as exacerbating human insecurity across its different dimensions. They can serve to reinforce the dominance of wealthier countries in high value settings and push lower income countries further behind. To address these challenges the paper proposed an approach to AI governance for human security integrating innovation, empowerment and protection with transparency, accountability and responsibilisation in decision-making and selection of AI tools across the policy lifecycle. The framework offers a distinct alternative to prevailing ethics-based approaches and suggests the tools and infrastructure to effectively develop, manage and implement an AI eco-system and public governance architecture that are not only innovative, but also empowering and protective in developing contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Published
2025-10-31
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Security and digital transformation of governance in development contexts

Zahid Mumtaz, Patricia A Kennett
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Human Security and digital transformation of governance in development contexts

Zahid Mumtaz, Patricia A Kennett
article en

Abstract

Across the policy life-cycle and a range of policy areas AI is driving innovation and has come to represent a technological paradigm shift in the public sector through its growing role in public service decision-making and delivery, at a time of increasingly complex and interconnected challenges for human security, public policy and state capacity (Misuraca &amp; van Noordt, 2020). This large-scale and rapid role of foundation models, large language models and generative AI has been accompanied by substantial research considering their potential impacts across societies and highlighting the complex issues for law, policy and practice it presents (Zuiderwijk et al., 2021). This paper seeks to contribute to debates by drawing together the connections between human security, the policy cycle, and AI and governance innovation in the public sector to explore the diverse challenges and opportunities in a development context. <br/>Economic, infrastructure and educational disparities (Aderibigbe et al., 2023) as well as power asymmetries, the digital divide and AI colonialism and technological dependency (Regilme, 2025) have all been highlighted as dynamics that can impact the wider adoption of and governance innovation in AI in diverse developing socio-economic contexts as well as exacerbating human insecurity across its different dimensions. They can serve to reinforce the dominance of wealthier countries in high value settings and push lower income countries further behind. To address these challenges the paper proposed an approach to AI governance for human security integrating innovation, empowerment and protection with transparency, accountability and responsibilisation in decision-making and selection of AI tools across the policy lifecycle. The framework offers a distinct alternative to prevailing ethics-based approaches and suggests the tools and infrastructure to effectively develop, manage and implement an AI eco-system and public governance architecture that are not only innovative, but also empowering and protective in developing contexts.

Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Cabot (United States) (US), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human Security and digital transformation of governance in development contexts — Zahid Mumtaz, Patricia A Kennett · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS