Folkloric finalities? Exclusions of oppositional mothers in adoption law and folk tales

This chapter offers analysis of recent developments in adoption case law from within several regions of the United Kingdom (UK), and argues that some of this jurisprudence on non-consensual maternal relinquishments - those which are enabled via court orders to dispense with the mother’s consent - call to mind certain folkloric tropes. Folk and fairy tales often portray gendered, demonising stigmas. These can frame some mothers as dangerously other, by way of their ‘oppositional’ attitudes and behaviours, in the wake of their apparent abandonment of their maternal identity and status. Once excluded from the sacred spaces and norms of the familial, these exiled mothers are generally precluded from bringing any form of challenge or appeal against the decisions that have most affected them, in law as in much of the folklore. Reunion, so certain tales warn us, carries a high risk: its prevention generally requires the removal, loss, or veiling of original maternal identities. The many and varied finalities of adoption (Bainham, 2009) – particularly from the perspective of the ‘voluntarily’ surrendering mother – are therefore often profound.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2025-02-19
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Folkloric finalities? Exclusions of oppositional mothers in adoption law and folk tales

Alice; id_orcid 0000-0003-2268-6931 Diver
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Folkloric finalities? Exclusions of oppositional mothers in adoption law and folk tales

Alice; id_orcid 0000-0003-2268-6931 Diver
article en

Abstract

This chapter offers analysis of recent developments in adoption case law from within several regions of the United Kingdom (UK), and argues that some of this jurisprudence on non-consensual maternal relinquishments - those which are enabled via court orders to dispense with the mother’s consent - call to mind certain folkloric tropes. Folk and fairy tales often portray gendered, demonising stigmas. These can frame some mothers as dangerously other, by way of their ‘oppositional’ attitudes and behaviours, in the wake of their apparent abandonment of their maternal identity and status. Once excluded from the sacred spaces and norms of the familial, these exiled mothers are generally precluded from bringing any form of challenge or appeal against the decisions that have most affected them, in law as in much of the folklore. Reunion, so certain tales warn us, carries a high risk: its prevention generally requires the removal, loss, or veiling of original maternal identities. The many and varied finalities of adoption (Bainham, 2009) – particularly from the perspective of the ‘voluntarily’ surrendering mother – are therefore often profound.

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Folkloric finalities? Exclusions of oppositional mothers in adoption law and folk tales — Alice; id_orcid 0000-0003-2268-6931 Diver · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS