Constructing Success: The World Bank, Onchocerciasis Control, & What Lies Beneath Global Health Triumphalist Narratives

Using a historical case study of the World Bank and World Health Organization (WHO)’s Onchocerciasis Control Programme (OCP, 1972-2002), I explore how success is conceptualised in global health and why it matters for policy and priority-setting. First, I summarise the ‘dominant’ OCP success narrative that has emerged since the 1980s, which is based on public health, socio-economic, and humanitarian justifications for the programme’s effectiveness. Next, I analyse how socio-economic metrics linking the programme’s disease control to increased labour productivity and agricultural land availability evolved in the 1980-90s. This alternative analysis of the OCP demonstrates how metrics, particularly when divorced from their assumptions and political context, are pliable and constructible. I argue that the OCP’s success was actively constructed by the World Bank, and that moving beyond triumphalist, programme-level ‘lessons-learned’ approaches within global health requires disruption of the epistemic, institutional, and discursive power that ‘lies beneath’ success narratives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2024-12-09
Primary Topic
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing Success: The World Bank, Onchocerciasis Control, & What Lies Beneath Global Health Triumphalist Narratives

Janelle; id_orcid 0000-0002-3450-7673 Winters
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
article

Constructing Success: The World Bank, Onchocerciasis Control, & What Lies Beneath Global Health Triumphalist Narratives

Janelle; id_orcid 0000-0002-3450-7673 Winters
article en

Abstract

Using a historical case study of the World Bank and World Health Organization (WHO)’s Onchocerciasis Control Programme (OCP, 1972-2002), I explore how success is conceptualised in global health and why it matters for policy and priority-setting. First, I summarise the ‘dominant’ OCP success narrative that has emerged since the 1980s, which is based on public health, socio-economic, and humanitarian justifications for the programme’s effectiveness. Next, I analyse how socio-economic metrics linking the programme’s disease control to increased labour productivity and agricultural land availability evolved in the 1980-90s. This alternative analysis of the OCP demonstrates how metrics, particularly when divorced from their assumptions and political context, are pliable and constructible. I argue that the OCP’s success was actively constructed by the World Bank, and that moving beyond triumphalist, programme-level ‘lessons-learned’ approaches within global health requires disruption of the epistemic, institutional, and discursive power that ‘lies beneath’ success narratives.

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Constructing Success: The World Bank, Onchocerciasis Control, & What Lies Beneath Global Health Triumphalist Narratives — Janelle; id_orcid 0000-0002-3450-7673 Winters · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS