Multilevel network meta-regression for time-to-event outcomes in educational symposium. Indirect treatment comparison methodology matters:unlocking the essentials for robust analysis

Indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) are frequently required in health technology assessments due to the lack of head-to-head trials for interventions of interest. Methodological guidance for ITCs, such as the European Union Member State Coordination Group's guidelines in supporting Joint Clinical Assessment on quantitative evidence synthesis and NICE's Technical Support Documents on evidence synthesis and population-adjusted indirect comparisons, provide detailed advice on applying various ITC approaches in practice.<br/>Network meta-analysis is the most widely used ITC approach, under the assumption that any variables that modify treatment effects are balanced across the included study populations. Recent population-adjusted ITC methods aim to relax this assumption, adjusting for differences between populations using individual participant data from one or more studies. Despite its limitations – such as requiring and being sensitive to population overlap, being restricted to estimates in aggregate study populations, and being limited to two-study indirect comparisons – matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) remains the most commonly used population-adjusted ITC approach. However, poorly conducted ITCs can have significant consequences, potentially leading to a potential cost-effective intervention not being reimbursed.<br/>This session will explore innovations in ITC methodologies and introduce alternative approaches to MAIC, including simulated treatment comparison (STC) and multilevel network meta-regression (ML-NMR), with a special focus on applications to time-to-event outcomes. Case studies will be presented to highlight the limitations and pitfalls of MAIC, while demonstrating how alternative methods can address these limitations.<br/>Attendees will gain a comprehensive understanding of the diverse range of ITC approaches and acquire practical knowledge of the key principles needed for performing robust ITC analyses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Explore Bristol Research
Published
2024-11-20
Primary Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multilevel network meta-regression for time-to-event outcomes in educational symposium. Indirect treatment comparison methodology matters:unlocking the essentials for robust analysis

David Phillippo
Explore Bristol Research
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
article

Multilevel network meta-regression for time-to-event outcomes in educational symposium. Indirect treatment comparison methodology matters:unlocking the essentials for robust analysis

David Phillippo
article en

Abstract

Indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) are frequently required in health technology assessments due to the lack of head-to-head trials for interventions of interest. Methodological guidance for ITCs, such as the European Union Member State Coordination Group's guidelines in supporting Joint Clinical Assessment on quantitative evidence synthesis and NICE's Technical Support Documents on evidence synthesis and population-adjusted indirect comparisons, provide detailed advice on applying various ITC approaches in practice.<br/>Network meta-analysis is the most widely used ITC approach, under the assumption that any variables that modify treatment effects are balanced across the included study populations. Recent population-adjusted ITC methods aim to relax this assumption, adjusting for differences between populations using individual participant data from one or more studies. Despite its limitations – such as requiring and being sensitive to population overlap, being restricted to estimates in aggregate study populations, and being limited to two-study indirect comparisons – matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) remains the most commonly used population-adjusted ITC approach. However, poorly conducted ITCs can have significant consequences, potentially leading to a potential cost-effective intervention not being reimbursed.<br/>This session will explore innovations in ITC methodologies and introduce alternative approaches to MAIC, including simulated treatment comparison (STC) and multilevel network meta-regression (ML-NMR), with a special focus on applications to time-to-event outcomes. Case studies will be presented to highlight the limitations and pitfalls of MAIC, while demonstrating how alternative methods can address these limitations.<br/>Attendees will gain a comprehensive understanding of the diverse range of ITC approaches and acquire practical knowledge of the key principles needed for performing robust ITC analyses.

Explore Bristol Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multilevel network meta-regression for time-to-event outcomes in educational symposium. Indirect treatment comparison methodology matters:unlocking the essentials for robust analysis — David Phillippo · Explore Bristol Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS