Function Allocation for Responsible Artificial Intelligence:How do we allocate trust and responsibility?

We consider how guidelines for Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) need to be adapted to address the challenges of Function Allocation (FA) in human-agent teams. We offer an approach that takes a system description, using CWA, to identify where responsibility for consequences of actions might lie across the system. We propose that, in addition to allocation of functions, analysis of the system needs to identify decision points (where agents have a choice of action to perform) and responsibility points (where agents identify the consequences of their decisions). We illustrate this with example experiments. We put forward a set of open challenges and questions facing researchers in the areas of RAI and FA. We point to the need for greater emphasis on the issue of responsibility, trust and accountability in new forms of automation. We also provide pointers for the future and how these might be addressed in the coming years.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Published
2025-04-30
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Function Allocation for Responsible Artificial Intelligence:How do we allocate trust and responsibility?

Sally Maynard, Patrick Waterson, Sanja Milivojević, Chris Baber et al.
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Function Allocation for Responsible Artificial Intelligence:How do we allocate trust and responsibility?

Sally Maynard, Patrick Waterson, Sanja Milivojević, Chris Baber, Edmund R Hunt, Mirco Musolesi
article en

Abstract

We consider how guidelines for Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) need to be adapted to address the challenges of Function Allocation (FA) in human-agent teams. We offer an approach that takes a system description, using CWA, to identify where responsibility for consequences of actions might lie across the system. We propose that, in addition to allocation of functions, analysis of the system needs to identify decision points (where agents have a choice of action to perform) and responsibility points (where agents identify the consequences of their decisions). We illustrate this with example experiments. We put forward a set of open challenges and questions facing researchers in the areas of RAI and FA. We point to the need for greater emphasis on the issue of responsibility, trust and accountability in new forms of automation. We also provide pointers for the future and how these might be addressed in the coming years.

Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Loughborough University (GB), Futures Group (United States) (US), University College London (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.