The AfGT in the age of Generative Artificial Intelligence

The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has disrupted education and, in particular, assessment. Universities and schools are finding it difficult to depend on the submission of student artefacts when evaluating student learning. Mounting research suggests the need to rethink existing assessment practices to ensure that they are not compromised by GenAI. As a high stakes Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) instrument adopted by several initial teacher education providers in Australia, the Assessment for Graduate Teaching (AfGT) needs to be examined in terms of its fitness for purpose in what is becoming an increasingly AI saturated world. Using a Perspective qualitative research approach, in this paper we critically examine current and future implications of the use of GenAI on the AfGT. Potential challenges and affordances of these emergent technologies are detailed and the role of AI literacy in the context of the AfGT is unpacked. We conclude with selected recommendations that would help to ensure the continued reliability and fidelity of the instrument and to help keep the four Elements of the AfGT aligned with purposes for which it was designed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)
Published
2025-12-04
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The AfGT in the age of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Hayden Park, Harry Galatis, Grace; id_orcid 0000-0002-1177-1738 Oakley
UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

The AfGT in the age of Generative Artificial Intelligence

Hayden Park, Harry Galatis, Grace; id_orcid 0000-0002-1177-1738 Oakley
article en

Abstract

The advent of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has disrupted education and, in particular, assessment. Universities and schools are finding it difficult to depend on the submission of student artefacts when evaluating student learning. Mounting research suggests the need to rethink existing assessment practices to ensure that they are not compromised by GenAI. As a high stakes Teaching Performance Assessment (TPA) instrument adopted by several initial teacher education providers in Australia, the Assessment for Graduate Teaching (AfGT) needs to be examined in terms of its fitness for purpose in what is becoming an increasingly AI saturated world. Using a Perspective qualitative research approach, in this paper we critically examine current and future implications of the use of GenAI on the AfGT. Potential challenges and affordances of these emergent technologies are detailed and the role of AI literacy in the context of the AfGT is unpacked. We conclude with selected recommendations that would help to ensure the continued reliability and fidelity of the instrument and to help keep the four Elements of the AfGT aligned with purposes for which it was designed.

UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The AfGT in the age of Generative Artificial Intelligence — Hayden Park, Harry Galatis, et al. · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS