From hectares to households:Farmer centric crop-modelling to assess differential climate change impacts and adaptation response

Crop simulation models (CSMs) are an important decision support tool in climate risk assessments and in designing resilient agricultural systems. However, these crop models simplify complex farming household diversity and systemic heterogeneities as they consider only the “mean” farmer. In this paper, we are particularly interested to understand how egalitarian is the crop simulation modeling approach in terms of its capacity to provide a more nuanced picture of impacts across different farmer types (classified based on assess and endowment of resources). To do this, we investigated the impact of climate change on maize and sorghum yield for different types of farming households through an ex-ante assessment, and the yield response to adaptation strategies (supplementary irrigation, switching varieties and agroforestry) in Northern Ghana. We find that with the same intensity of changes in climatic variables, yield impacts are different between maize and sorghum, with more impacts on maize across scenarios. We further observe that the highest impacts on maize (16% for low emission scenario and 25% for high emission scenario) and sorghum (6% low emission scenario and 14% for high emission scenario) are on the medium resource endowed farmer (MRE), whose yield losses are in order of magnitude of about twice of the low resource endowed farmer (LRE) and the high resource endowed (HRE) farmer. The yield response to adaptation measures was also different across the three farmer types and crops. Irrigation was the most effective adaptation strategy but was more effective for the MRE farmer for maize (52% low emission scenario and 66% for high emission scenario) and sorghum (74% low emission scenario and 76% for high emission scenario). However, using an improved variety was only effective for maize for the MRE farmer but not so much for sorghum across the farmer types. Our findings underline the critical need to integrate farming household diversity into crop simulation models, to understand the differential impacts of climate change and the prioritized adaptation responses within the same region. These differential impacts and responses should be considered in designing and implementing climate change resilience initiatives.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
University of Twente Research Information
Published
2024-09-12
Primary Topic
Climate change impacts on agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From hectares to households:Farmer centric crop-modelling to assess differential climate change impacts and adaptation response

Abel Chemura, Paula Romanovska, Lisa Murken, Christoph Gornott et al.
University of Twente Research Information
Climate change impacts on agriculture
article

From hectares to households:Farmer centric crop-modelling to assess differential climate change impacts and adaptation response

Abel Chemura, Paula Romanovska, Lisa Murken, Christoph Gornott, R.N. Shukla
article en

Abstract

Crop simulation models (CSMs) are an important decision support tool in climate risk assessments and in designing resilient agricultural systems. However, these crop models simplify complex farming household diversity and systemic heterogeneities as they consider only the “mean” farmer. In this paper, we are particularly interested to understand how egalitarian is the crop simulation modeling approach in terms of its capacity to provide a more nuanced picture of impacts across different farmer types (classified based on assess and endowment of resources). To do this, we investigated the impact of climate change on maize and sorghum yield for different types of farming households through an ex-ante assessment, and the yield response to adaptation strategies (supplementary irrigation, switching varieties and agroforestry) in Northern Ghana. We find that with the same intensity of changes in climatic variables, yield impacts are different between maize and sorghum, with more impacts on maize across scenarios. We further observe that the highest impacts on maize (16% for low emission scenario and 25% for high emission scenario) and sorghum (6% low emission scenario and 14% for high emission scenario) are on the medium resource endowed farmer (MRE), whose yield losses are in order of magnitude of about twice of the low resource endowed farmer (LRE) and the high resource endowed (HRE) farmer. The yield response to adaptation measures was also different across the three farmer types and crops. Irrigation was the most effective adaptation strategy but was more effective for the MRE farmer for maize (52% low emission scenario and 66% for high emission scenario) and sorghum (74% low emission scenario and 76% for high emission scenario). However, using an improved variety was only effective for maize for the MRE farmer but not so much for sorghum across the farmer types. Our findings underline the critical need to integrate farming household diversity into crop simulation models, to understand the differential impacts of climate change and the prioritized adaptation responses within the same region. These differential impacts and responses should be considered in designing and implementing climate change resilience initiatives.

University of Twente Research Information
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Climate change impacts on agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.