Reconciliation in international human rights law: perceptions, principles and practice

This article examines the relationship between reconciliation and international human rights law by analysing the case law and reports of international courts and human rights treaty bodies in light of multidisciplinary theory on reconciliation. It establishes that human rights institutions see reconciliation as a complex objective that should entail: the restoration of horizontal and vertical relationships; inclusivity in the design and implementation of measures to deal with the past; independent investigations and acknowledgement of past harms; and meaningful efforts to understand and address the root causes of conflict. Having established this theoretical and legal framework for the advancement of “thicker” reconciliation, the article critically examines the work of the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR) in Northern Ireland. It argues that challenges arising from its controversial origins as well as limitations in its remit and power substantially curb its ability to advance human-rights based reconciliation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Military, Security, and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconciliation in international human rights law: perceptions, principles and practice

Louise; id_orcid 0000-0002-6692-1721 Mallinder, Anna; id_orcid 0000-0002-5406-3504 Bryson
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Military, Security, and Education Studies
article

Reconciliation in international human rights law: perceptions, principles and practice

Louise; id_orcid 0000-0002-6692-1721 Mallinder, Anna; id_orcid 0000-0002-5406-3504 Bryson
article en

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between reconciliation and international human rights law by analysing the case law and reports of international courts and human rights treaty bodies in light of multidisciplinary theory on reconciliation. It establishes that human rights institutions see reconciliation as a complex objective that should entail: the restoration of horizontal and vertical relationships; inclusivity in the design and implementation of measures to deal with the past; independent investigations and acknowledgement of past harms; and meaningful efforts to understand and address the root causes of conflict. Having established this theoretical and legal framework for the advancement of “thicker” reconciliation, the article critically examines the work of the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR) in Northern Ireland. It argues that challenges arising from its controversial origins as well as limitations in its remit and power substantially curb its ability to advance human-rights based reconciliation.

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
United States Institute of Peace (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Military, Security, and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.