Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT)

\(\bf Purpose\) The objective of this study is to assess the validity of the German version of the Children's Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT), an internationally used tool for the detection of eating disorder (ED) symptoms, in a clinical sample. \(\bf Methods\) The ChEAT self-report questionnaire, comprising 26 items, was employed to examine eating behaviors of a clinical sample of 342 adolescents (aged 12–18 years) undergoing inpatient treatment at a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic in Germany. The ChEAT was validated through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and an examination of internal consistency. Subsequent analyses were conducted to identify differences associated with participant characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis. Furthermore, additional eating behaviors, depression, and anxiety symptoms were documented via supplementary questionnaires and correlated to the ChEAT to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity. \(\bf Results\) The factorial validity of the ChEAT was confirmed through EFA and CFA, resulting in a five-factor structure with the following dimensions: 'Body and Weight Concern,' 'Dieting,' 'Social Pressure,' 'Purging and Binge Eating,' and 'Food Preoccupation'. The 24-item model showed high internal consistency and demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data. Convergent and discriminant validity of the ChEAT was supported by significant correlations with other self-report questionnaires. Higher ChEAT average scores were observed in females and those with a history of eating or depressive disorders, whereas age or BMI showed no correlation. \(\bf Conclusion\) The data demonstrate that the German version of the ChEAT appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for identifying ED symptoms in clinical samples. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the factor structure and validity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dokumentenrepositorium der RUB (Ruhr University Bochum)
Published
2025-08-14
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT)

Natalie Deux, Tanja Legenbauer, Lena Nonnast, Laura M. Derks et al.
Dokumentenrepositorium der RUB (Ruhr University Bochum)
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
article

Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT)

Natalie Deux, Tanja Legenbauer, Lena Nonnast, Laura M. Derks, Martin (Prof. Dr. Dr. med.) Holtmann
article en

Abstract

\(\bf Purpose\) The objective of this study is to assess the validity of the German version of the Children's Eating Attitudes Test (ChEAT), an internationally used tool for the detection of eating disorder (ED) symptoms, in a clinical sample. \(\bf Methods\) The ChEAT self-report questionnaire, comprising 26 items, was employed to examine eating behaviors of a clinical sample of 342 adolescents (aged 12–18 years) undergoing inpatient treatment at a child and adolescent psychiatric clinic in Germany. The ChEAT was validated through an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), followed by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and an examination of internal consistency. Subsequent analyses were conducted to identify differences associated with participant characteristics, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and diagnosis. Furthermore, additional eating behaviors, depression, and anxiety symptoms were documented via supplementary questionnaires and correlated to the ChEAT to evaluate the convergent and discriminant validity. \(\bf Results\) The factorial validity of the ChEAT was confirmed through EFA and CFA, resulting in a five-factor structure with the following dimensions: 'Body and Weight Concern,' 'Dieting,' 'Social Pressure,' 'Purging and Binge Eating,' and 'Food Preoccupation'. The 24-item model showed high internal consistency and demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data. Convergent and discriminant validity of the ChEAT was supported by significant correlations with other self-report questionnaires. Higher ChEAT average scores were observed in females and those with a history of eating or depressive disorders, whereas age or BMI showed no correlation. \(\bf Conclusion\) The data demonstrate that the German version of the ChEAT appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for identifying ED symptoms in clinical samples. However, further studies are necessary to evaluate the factor structure and validity.

Dokumentenrepositorium der RUB (Ruhr University Bochum)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.