Placebo and Nocebo Responses in Gabapentin Enacarbil and Pregabalin Trials for Restless Legs Syndrome:Time-Course Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-analysis of Proportions

<b>Purpose</b>:<br/>Placebo responses are often stronger in randomized controlled trials (RCT) on conditions that measure subjective improvement in symptoms, such as restless legs syndrome (RLS). This meta-analysis sought to quantify both placebo and nocebo responses in published RCTs of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) and pregabalin.<br/><br/><b>Methods</b>:<br/>In the first meta-analytic approach, we evaluated the time-courses taken by the participants randomized to the different doses of GEn and pregabalin and to placebo in their responses in International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) scores. This was primarily evaluated by estimating the posterior median ET50s, the time (days) at which 50% of maximum response was achieved in IRLS scores for these participants. In a second meta-analytic approach, one-arm meta-analyses estimated proportions of participants on placebo considered “responders” on the investigator-initiated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, and separately of those who developed somnolence and dizziness. <br/><b><br/>Results</b>:<br/>A total of 16 RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Relative differences in ET50s (median and 95% credible intervals) between GEn 600, 900, 1200, 1800, 2400 mg/d doses and placebo were 1.09 (0.07; 2.92), 1.35 (0.05; 5.85), 0.56 (0.02; 1.79), 0.62 (0.03; 2.34) and 1.61 (0.10; 5.22) days, respectively, and between pregabalin mean doses of 107.8 and 337.5 mg/d and placebo were 21.75 (0.89; 145.26) and 2.54 (0.12; 8.41) days, respectively, indicating largely clinically insignificant differences. Pooled proportion of CGI-I responders amongst the participants randomized to placebo was 0.40 [(95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.31; 0.49), I2=84%]. Duration of RCTs and previous RLS treatment were associated with CGI-I response based on meta-regression analyses. Pooled proportions of participants randomized to placebo who developed somnolence and dizziness were 0.05 [(95%CIs: 0.03; 0.08), I2=75%], and 0.02 [(95%CIs: 0.01; 0.04), I2=62%], respectively. <br/><b><br/>Conclusions</b>:<br/>GEn and pregabalin showed substantial placebo responses in RCTs. Further studies are needed that would identify predictor variables for placebo responders or non-responders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Published
2026-03-11
Primary Topic
Restless Legs Syndrome Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Placebo and Nocebo Responses in Gabapentin Enacarbil and Pregabalin Trials for Restless Legs Syndrome:Time-Course Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-analysis of Proportions

Essa Albisher, Imran H. Iftikhar, Olga Lacki, Ahmed BaHammam et al.
Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
Restless Legs Syndrome Research
article

Placebo and Nocebo Responses in Gabapentin Enacarbil and Pregabalin Trials for Restless Legs Syndrome:Time-Course Model-Based Network Meta-Analysis and Meta-analysis of Proportions

Essa Albisher, Imran H. Iftikhar, Olga Lacki, Ahmed BaHammam, Hugo Pedder
article en

Abstract

<b>Purpose</b>:<br/>Placebo responses are often stronger in randomized controlled trials (RCT) on conditions that measure subjective improvement in symptoms, such as restless legs syndrome (RLS). This meta-analysis sought to quantify both placebo and nocebo responses in published RCTs of gabapentin enacarbil (GEn) and pregabalin.<br/><br/><b>Methods</b>:<br/>In the first meta-analytic approach, we evaluated the time-courses taken by the participants randomized to the different doses of GEn and pregabalin and to placebo in their responses in International RLS Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS) scores. This was primarily evaluated by estimating the posterior median ET50s, the time (days) at which 50% of maximum response was achieved in IRLS scores for these participants. In a second meta-analytic approach, one-arm meta-analyses estimated proportions of participants on placebo considered “responders” on the investigator-initiated Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, and separately of those who developed somnolence and dizziness. <br/><b><br/>Results</b>:<br/>A total of 16 RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. Relative differences in ET50s (median and 95% credible intervals) between GEn 600, 900, 1200, 1800, 2400 mg/d doses and placebo were 1.09 (0.07; 2.92), 1.35 (0.05; 5.85), 0.56 (0.02; 1.79), 0.62 (0.03; 2.34) and 1.61 (0.10; 5.22) days, respectively, and between pregabalin mean doses of 107.8 and 337.5 mg/d and placebo were 21.75 (0.89; 145.26) and 2.54 (0.12; 8.41) days, respectively, indicating largely clinically insignificant differences. Pooled proportion of CGI-I responders amongst the participants randomized to placebo was 0.40 [(95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.31; 0.49), I2=84%]. Duration of RCTs and previous RLS treatment were associated with CGI-I response based on meta-regression analyses. Pooled proportions of participants randomized to placebo who developed somnolence and dizziness were 0.05 [(95%CIs: 0.03; 0.08), I2=75%], and 0.02 [(95%CIs: 0.01; 0.04), I2=62%], respectively. <br/><b><br/>Conclusions</b>:<br/>GEn and pregabalin showed substantial placebo responses in RCTs. Further studies are needed that would identify predictor variables for placebo responders or non-responders.

Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology (SA), Emory University (US), Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization (SA), King Saud University (SA), Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US), Atlanta VA Health Care System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Restless Legs Syndrome Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.