Guidelines for Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: from Definitions to Design

Despite recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL), significant barriers remain when applying it to a broad spectrum of safety-critical domains. Fundamentally, there is a notable absence of a standard definition of safe and robust RL and standardised checklists or guidelines to ensure the safe and robust design and deployment of RL systems. This paper addresses these gaps by compiling existing definitions of safe and robust RL, suggesting a consensus definition for each concept. We also propose a comprehensive checklist designed to enhance the safety and reliability of reinforcement learning applications, while remaining flexible to be tailored to the specific applications at hand. The checklist comes in the form of essential items and actions for practitioners and policy makers to follow, categorised for simplicity. Additionally, this checklist aims to present a starting point for further discussions and collaboration within the community. We hope this paper serves as a foundation for developing detailed principles for reinforcement learning across safety-critical fields and sequential decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Explore Bristol Research
Published
2025-09-19
Primary Topic
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: from Definitions to Design

Taku Yamagata, Raul Santos-Rodriguez
Explore Bristol Research
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
article

Guidelines for Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: from Definitions to Design

Taku Yamagata, Raul Santos-Rodriguez
article en

Abstract

Despite recent advances in reinforcement learning (RL), significant barriers remain when applying it to a broad spectrum of safety-critical domains. Fundamentally, there is a notable absence of a standard definition of safe and robust RL and standardised checklists or guidelines to ensure the safe and robust design and deployment of RL systems. This paper addresses these gaps by compiling existing definitions of safe and robust RL, suggesting a consensus definition for each concept. We also propose a comprehensive checklist designed to enhance the safety and reliability of reinforcement learning applications, while remaining flexible to be tailored to the specific applications at hand. The checklist comes in the form of essential items and actions for practitioners and policy makers to follow, categorised for simplicity. Additionally, this checklist aims to present a starting point for further discussions and collaboration within the community. We hope this paper serves as a foundation for developing detailed principles for reinforcement learning across safety-critical fields and sequential decision-making.

Explore Bristol Research
Office of Science (US)
UK Research and Innovation, Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Guidelines for Safe and Robust Reinforcement Learning: from Definitions to Design — Taku Yamagata, Raul Santos-Rodriguez · Explore Bristol Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS