Children, human rights and vaccination in the pursuit of the highest attainable standard of health in Europe

There is a tightrope between the need to safeguard the health of children and broader society and the need to protect the manifestation of children’s rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This chapter examines the tension between these competing but parallel rights. Accordingly, it considers the historical relationship between the vaccination of children and European human rights law and ethics. Focus is placed on the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) judgment in Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic. The chapter recognises and validates the importance of vaccination in the context of global health, but queries whether mandatory vaccination of children is an ethically appropriate approach. Attention is given to the specific concepts such as solidarity, autonomy, best interests, justice and harm as they apply to vaccination of children. The chapter argues that mandatory childhood vaccination, as it stands, is not fully aligned with some medical ethical principles. A new approach based on ‘Solidaristic autonomy’ is presented as a means of addressing this difficulty and of promoting best practice in vaccination policy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Published
2025-10-02
Primary Topic
Children's Rights and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children, human rights and vaccination in the pursuit of the highest attainable standard of health in Europe

Clayton; id_orcid 0000-0001-9856-7598 Ó Néill
Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Children's Rights and Participation
article

Children, human rights and vaccination in the pursuit of the highest attainable standard of health in Europe

Clayton; id_orcid 0000-0001-9856-7598 Ó Néill
article en

Abstract

There is a tightrope between the need to safeguard the health of children and broader society and the need to protect the manifestation of children’s rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). This chapter examines the tension between these competing but parallel rights. Accordingly, it considers the historical relationship between the vaccination of children and European human rights law and ethics. Focus is placed on the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) judgment in Vavřička and Others v. the Czech Republic. The chapter recognises and validates the importance of vaccination in the context of global health, but queries whether mandatory vaccination of children is an ethically appropriate approach. Attention is given to the specific concepts such as solidarity, autonomy, best interests, justice and harm as they apply to vaccination of children. The chapter argues that mandatory childhood vaccination, as it stands, is not fully aligned with some medical ethical principles. A new approach based on ‘Solidaristic autonomy’ is presented as a means of addressing this difficulty and of promoting best practice in vaccination policy.

Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Children's Rights and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Children, human rights and vaccination in the pursuit of the highest attainable standard of health in Europe — Clayton; id_orcid 0000-0001-9856-7598 Ó Néill · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS