GPT-4o reads the mind in the eyes

Humans possess a sophisticated ability to read the mind in the eyes of other people. Here we tested whether this ability is also present in GPT-4o, a multimodal LLM. Using two versions of a widely used theory of mind test, the Reading the Mind in Eyes Test and the Multiracial Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, we found that GPT-4o outperformed humans in extracting mentalistic information from upright faces but underperformed humans when faces were inverted. GPT-4o errors were not random but revealed a highly consistent, yet incorrect, processing of mental-state information across trials, with an orientation-dependent error structure that qualitatively differed from that of humans for inverted faces but not for upright faces. These findings highlight how advanced mental state inference abilities coexist in GPT-4o alongside substantial differences in information processing compared to humans. • GPT-4o surpasses humans in reading mental states from the eye-region. • Face inversion severely reduces GPT-4o’s mindreading. • Unlike human errors, GPT-4o’ errors are not random. • Error analysis reveals GPT-4o’s highly structured error space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers in Human Behavior
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2026.108992
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GPT-4o reads the mind in the eyes

Chunzhi Yi, Cristina Becchio, Eugenio Scaliti, Marco Celotto et al.
Computers in Human Behavior
Face Recognition and Perception
article

GPT-4o reads the mind in the eyes

Chunzhi Yi, Cristina Becchio, Eugenio Scaliti, Marco Celotto, Guido Manzi, Oriana Pansardi, Alessandro Rufo, Krati Saxena, Stefano Panzeri, Fabio Manzi, James W.A. Strachan, Michael S.A. Graziano
article en

Abstract

Humans possess a sophisticated ability to read the mind in the eyes of other people. Here we tested whether this ability is also present in GPT-4o, a multimodal LLM. Using two versions of a widely used theory of mind test, the Reading the Mind in Eyes Test and the Multiracial Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, we found that GPT-4o outperformed humans in extracting mentalistic information from upright faces but underperformed humans when faces were inverted. GPT-4o errors were not random but revealed a highly consistent, yet incorrect, processing of mental-state information across trials, with an orientation-dependent error structure that qualitatively differed from that of humans for inverted faces but not for upright faces. These findings highlight how advanced mental state inference abilities coexist in GPT-4o alongside substantial differences in information processing compared to humans. • GPT-4o surpasses humans in reading mental states from the eye-region. • Face inversion severely reduces GPT-4o’s mindreading. • Unlike human errors, GPT-4o’ errors are not random. • Error analysis reveals GPT-4o’s highly structured error space.

Computers in Human BehaviorVol. 181
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES), Universität Hamburg (DE), Princeton University (US), Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Italian Institute of Technology (IT), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE), Heilongjiang Institute of Technology (CN), University of Turin (IT), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.