Simple programming algorithms in advanced rotational metal forming processes

Abstract Research and development of CNC machines dedicated to rotational metal forming processes have made it possible to form difficult non–circular geometries and even more difficult axially asymmetrical ones. New processes require not only the development of new methods for creating metal–forming trajectories but also the identification of their advantages and disadvantages. This article presents mathematical equations and algorithms for trajectory design in the rotational metal forming of axially asymmetrical parts. Simple algorithms using conditional while–loops were developed that are compatible with modern CNC machines. The algorithms were used to metal form parts with complex axially asymmetrical geometry. An analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of selected technological parameters on the trajectory generation process. The impact of rotational symmetry was assessed by analysing the number of commands required to execute a single forming movement using mandrels with circular, elliptical, square, and asymmetrical cross–sections. The $$\alpha $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:math> angle was examined for values $$\alpha =90^{\circ }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and $$\alpha &gt;90^{\circ }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , while differences in trajectory programming between absolute–G90 and incremental–G91 positioning systems were analysed. Results from FEM simulations and laboratory tests were presented, in which an axially asymmetrical mandrel was employed, and EN AW–1050A aluminium alloy was formed. Advantages and limitations of the proposed trajectory design method were discussed. A modern division for Rotational Metal Forming processes was proposed. RMF was divided into subcategories: axially symmetrical ( Shear Forming—RMF SF and Metal Spinning—RMF MS ) and asymmetrical processes ( Rotationally Symmetrical—RMF RS and Axially Asymmetrical—RMF AA ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-026-02824-4
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Simple programming algorithms in advanced rotational metal forming processes

M. Lijewski, L. Klimek, T. Gądek, Marcin Majewski
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
article

Simple programming algorithms in advanced rotational metal forming processes

M. Lijewski, L. Klimek, T. Gądek, Marcin Majewski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Research and development of CNC machines dedicated to rotational metal forming processes have made it possible to form difficult non–circular geometries and even more difficult axially asymmetrical ones. New processes require not only the development of new methods for creating metal–forming trajectories but also the identification of their advantages and disadvantages. This article presents mathematical equations and algorithms for trajectory design in the rotational metal forming of axially asymmetrical parts. Simple algorithms using conditional while–loops were developed that are compatible with modern CNC machines. The algorithms were used to metal form parts with complex axially asymmetrical geometry. An analysis was conducted to evaluate the influence of selected technological parameters on the trajectory generation process. The impact of rotational symmetry was assessed by analysing the number of commands required to execute a single forming movement using mandrels with circular, elliptical, square, and asymmetrical cross–sections. The $$\alpha $$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> </mml:math> angle was examined for values $$\alpha =90^{\circ }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> and $$\alpha &gt;90^{\circ }$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>90</mml:mn> <mml:mo>∘</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , while differences in trajectory programming between absolute–G90 and incremental–G91 positioning systems were analysed. Results from FEM simulations and laboratory tests were presented, in which an axially asymmetrical mandrel was employed, and EN AW–1050A aluminium alloy was formed. Advantages and limitations of the proposed trajectory design method were discussed. A modern division for Rotational Metal Forming processes was proposed. RMF was divided into subcategories: axially symmetrical ( Shear Forming—RMF SF and Metal Spinning—RMF MS ) and asymmetrical processes ( Rotationally Symmetrical—RMF RS and Axially Asymmetrical—RMF AA ).

Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing
Lodz University of Technology (PL), Poznań University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.