Aortic 4D Flow CMR for the Assessment of Hemodynamics in Aortic Stenosis – Association with Markers of Cardiac Decompensation and Remodeling

Aortic stenosis (AS) induces complex alterations in ascending aortic flow, including increased turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), altered velocity profiles, and changes in flow organization, which can be quantified using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The physiological relevance of these flow-derived parameters with respect to left ventricular (LV) adaptation remains incompletely understood. We investigated the associations between 4D flow CMR-derived hemodynamic metrics and established markers of LV decompensation and remodeling in patients with AS. Fifty-nine patients with AS (70 ± 14 yrs.) underwent 4D flow CMR using a Bayesian multipoint phase-contrast sequence with k-t PCA acceleration and three velocity-encoding steps in each direction. Quantified parameters included peak TKE, stroke volume-normalized systolic TKE (Normalized TKE<sub>sys</sub>), peak velocity, jet angle, relative flow displacement, and mean helicity. Associations with NT-proBNP and indexed LV mass were analyzed. Peak TKE, Normalized TKE<sub>sys</sub>, and peak systolic velocity were significantly associated with both indexed LV mass and NT-proBNP, whereas mean helicity was associated with indexed LV mass only. In contrast, jet angle and flow displacement showed no relationship with either marker of LV decompensation and remodeling. During long-term follow-up, no 4D flow CMR parameter was associated with adverse clinical events, likely due to timely valve replacement in most patients. In conclusion, these findings indicate that flow energetics - particularly TKE and peak systolic velocity - most closely capture the hemodynamic burden imposed on the LV supporting their physiological relevance in AS. Isolated descriptors of flow geometry, in contrast, have not shown to reflect maladaptive LV remodeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00043.2026
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aortic 4D Flow CMR for the Assessment of Hemodynamics in Aortic Stenosis – Association with Markers of Cardiac Decompensation and Remodeling

Robert Manka, Sebastian Kozerke, Christian Binter, Alexander Gotschy et al.
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Aortic 4D Flow CMR for the Assessment of Hemodynamics in Aortic Stenosis – Association with Markers of Cardiac Decompensation and Remodeling

Robert Manka, Sebastian Kozerke, Christian Binter, Alexander Gotschy, Rabea Schlenker, Felix C. Tanner
article en

Abstract

Aortic stenosis (AS) induces complex alterations in ascending aortic flow, including increased turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), altered velocity profiles, and changes in flow organization, which can be quantified using 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). The physiological relevance of these flow-derived parameters with respect to left ventricular (LV) adaptation remains incompletely understood. We investigated the associations between 4D flow CMR-derived hemodynamic metrics and established markers of LV decompensation and remodeling in patients with AS. Fifty-nine patients with AS (70 ± 14 yrs.) underwent 4D flow CMR using a Bayesian multipoint phase-contrast sequence with k-t PCA acceleration and three velocity-encoding steps in each direction. Quantified parameters included peak TKE, stroke volume-normalized systolic TKE (Normalized TKE<sub>sys</sub>), peak velocity, jet angle, relative flow displacement, and mean helicity. Associations with NT-proBNP and indexed LV mass were analyzed. Peak TKE, Normalized TKE<sub>sys</sub>, and peak systolic velocity were significantly associated with both indexed LV mass and NT-proBNP, whereas mean helicity was associated with indexed LV mass only. In contrast, jet angle and flow displacement showed no relationship with either marker of LV decompensation and remodeling. During long-term follow-up, no 4D flow CMR parameter was associated with adverse clinical events, likely due to timely valve replacement in most patients. In conclusion, these findings indicate that flow energetics - particularly TKE and peak systolic velocity - most closely capture the hemodynamic burden imposed on the LV supporting their physiological relevance in AS. Isolated descriptors of flow geometry, in contrast, have not shown to reflect maladaptive LV remodeling.

American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
ETH Zurich (CH), University Hospital of Zurich (CH)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.