A golden opportunity: Corporate sustainability reporting as a key lever to address nature-related risks

Corporate sustainability reporting currently fails to provide the information needed for companies, their investors and society to address mounting environmental risks because predominant reporting requirements focus heavily on firm-level risks, neglecting cumulative impacts on climate and nature. Recently, sustainability reporting has also been critiqued for the administrative burden it places on companies. Corporate reporting may seem far removed from sustainability science but is, in fact, a critical lever in directing corporate practice. A golden opportunity therefore exists for sustainability science to simultaneously help reduce, refine and improve sustainability reporting by identifying the most prioritized mandatory environmental disclosures and support the development of an open-access disclosure repository. This would radically improve the ability of investors, regulators, and public agencies to appraise environmental pressures, improve corporate accountability, and mitigate growing systemic risks. Treating environmental data with the rigor granted to financial data is fundamental to align capital with sustainability objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMBIO
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-026-02376-0
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A golden opportunity: Corporate sustainability reporting as a key lever to address nature-related risks

Giorgio Parlato, Beatrice Crona, Maxime Mathon, Véronique Blum et al.
AMBIO
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

A golden opportunity: Corporate sustainability reporting as a key lever to address nature-related risks

Giorgio Parlato, Beatrice Crona, Maxime Mathon, Véronique Blum, Stephen Polasky
article en

Abstract

Corporate sustainability reporting currently fails to provide the information needed for companies, their investors and society to address mounting environmental risks because predominant reporting requirements focus heavily on firm-level risks, neglecting cumulative impacts on climate and nature. Recently, sustainability reporting has also been critiqued for the administrative burden it places on companies. Corporate reporting may seem far removed from sustainability science but is, in fact, a critical lever in directing corporate practice. A golden opportunity therefore exists for sustainability science to simultaneously help reduce, refine and improve sustainability reporting by identifying the most prioritized mandatory environmental disclosures and support the development of an open-access disclosure repository. This would radically improve the ability of investors, regulators, and public agencies to appraise environmental pressures, improve corporate accountability, and mitigate growing systemic risks. Treating environmental data with the rigor granted to financial data is fundamental to align capital with sustainability objectives.

AMBIO
University of Minnesota (US), Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences (SE), Stockholm Resilience Centre (SE), Stockholm University (SE), Université de Bourgogne (FR), AlbaNova (SE), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse, Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholms Universitet
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.