Communication and autocommunication in Henri Verneuil’s autobiography <i>Mayrig</i>

Abstract This article examines Henri Verneuil’s autobiography, Mayrig (2005), as a vital cultural artifact that transmits and reshapes Armenian diasporic memory across generations. While existing scholarship recognizes the complexities of autobiographical truth and inherited trauma, less attention has been paid to how specific narrative strategies within diasporic autobiography reframe and expand established theoretical frameworks. Drawing primarily on Juri Lotman’s semiotic communication model “I-I,” this study argues that Mayrig demonstrates an expanded “collective I-I” model of (auto)communication, where the act of autobiography becomes a shared semiotic space for the Armenian diaspora to process inherited memory and forge collective identity. Complemented by insights from Philippe Lejeune’s autobiographical pact, Cathy Caruth’s trauma theory, and Marianne Hirsch’s notion of postmemory, this paper analyzes how Mayrig negotiates the ambiguities of personal and collective memory through Verneuil’s symbolic use of cultural practices, particularly the pakhlava scene. In doing so, it reveals how Mayrig not only transforms individual trauma into a dynamic, collective postmemory but also revises the autobiographical pact to encompass the complex, multifaceted self-representation inherent in transnational, diasporic identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Language and Semiotic Studies
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/lass-2025-0071
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communication and autocommunication in Henri Verneuil’s autobiography Mayrig

M. S. Mkrtchyan
Language and Semiotic Studies
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Communication and autocommunication in Henri Verneuil’s autobiography Mayrig

M. S. Mkrtchyan
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines Henri Verneuil’s autobiography, Mayrig (2005), as a vital cultural artifact that transmits and reshapes Armenian diasporic memory across generations. While existing scholarship recognizes the complexities of autobiographical truth and inherited trauma, less attention has been paid to how specific narrative strategies within diasporic autobiography reframe and expand established theoretical frameworks. Drawing primarily on Juri Lotman’s semiotic communication model “I-I,” this study argues that Mayrig demonstrates an expanded “collective I-I” model of (auto)communication, where the act of autobiography becomes a shared semiotic space for the Armenian diaspora to process inherited memory and forge collective identity. Complemented by insights from Philippe Lejeune’s autobiographical pact, Cathy Caruth’s trauma theory, and Marianne Hirsch’s notion of postmemory, this paper analyzes how Mayrig negotiates the ambiguities of personal and collective memory through Verneuil’s symbolic use of cultural practices, particularly the pakhlava scene. In doing so, it reveals how Mayrig not only transforms individual trauma into a dynamic, collective postmemory but also revises the autobiographical pact to encompass the complex, multifaceted self-representation inherent in transnational, diasporic identity.

Language and Semiotic Studies
Yerevan State Linguistic University (AM), National Academy of Sciences of Armenia (AM)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.