Comparison of Solid Swallowing Parameters in Healthy Individuals with Different Oropharyngeal Aperture Degrees

Objective: Individuals with a narrow oropharyngeal aperture may experience difficulty swallowing solid food. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the oropharyngeal aperture degrees and solid food swallowing performance parameters. Materials and Methods: The oropharyngeal aperture degree of the individuals was evaluated using the Mallampati classification. Based on this classification, the individuals were divided into four classes. Solid-food swallowing performance was evaluated using the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids. The number of bites, chews, and swallows, and the total eating time were recorded while individuals were eating the cracker. Result: A total of 176 individuals (96 females, 80 males) aged 18-65 years and without a complaint of swallowing difficulties, were included in the study. A difference was found among the classes in the number of bites during solid-food swallowing performance (p = 0.047). There was a difference between Class-I and Class-III (p = 0.018) and between Class-II and Class-III (p = 0.026). No difference was found among the classes regarding the number of chewing cycles, the number of swallows, and the total eating time (p = 0.108; p = 0.768; p = 0.256, respectively). Conclusion: The oropharyngeal aperture degrees do not affect solid food swallowing parameters. It is generally accepted that eating habits, rather than the oropharyngeal opening, influence the time required to eat solid foods in individuals without dysphagia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26453/otjhs.1822724
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Solid Swallowing Parameters in Healthy Individuals with Different Oropharyngeal Aperture Degrees

Çetin Sayaca, Esra Ulu, Özden Özkal
Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Comparison of Solid Swallowing Parameters in Healthy Individuals with Different Oropharyngeal Aperture Degrees

Çetin Sayaca, Esra Ulu, Özden Özkal
article en

Abstract

Objective: Individuals with a narrow oropharyngeal aperture may experience difficulty swallowing solid food. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between the oropharyngeal aperture degrees and solid food swallowing performance parameters. Materials and Methods: The oropharyngeal aperture degree of the individuals was evaluated using the Mallampati classification. Based on this classification, the individuals were divided into four classes. Solid-food swallowing performance was evaluated using the Test of Masticating and Swallowing Solids. The number of bites, chews, and swallows, and the total eating time were recorded while individuals were eating the cracker. Result: A total of 176 individuals (96 females, 80 males) aged 18-65 years and without a complaint of swallowing difficulties, were included in the study. A difference was found among the classes in the number of bites during solid-food swallowing performance (p = 0.047). There was a difference between Class-I and Class-III (p = 0.018) and between Class-II and Class-III (p = 0.026). No difference was found among the classes regarding the number of chewing cycles, the number of swallows, and the total eating time (p = 0.108; p = 0.768; p = 0.256, respectively). Conclusion: The oropharyngeal aperture degrees do not affect solid food swallowing parameters. It is generally accepted that eating habits, rather than the oropharyngeal opening, influence the time required to eat solid foods in individuals without dysphagia.

Online Türk Sağlık Bilimleri DergisiVol. 11(1)
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.