Psychoacoustically guided midfrequency band-limiting improves the diagnostic utility of classical acoustic measures in dysphonia

Human hearing is most sensitive around 3 kHz, where small changes in harmonic structure and noise are particularly noticeable. However, traditional or standard acoustic measures of dysphonia—jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio, and cepstral peak prominence smoothed—are usually calculated from full-band signals and do not account for this psychoacoustic weighting. Consequently, their diagnostic accuracy is often reduced in connected speech and cases of mild dysphonia, which are common clinical presentations. We tested a simple, low-cost preprocessing strategy that limited analysis to the 2–4 kHz frequency band before computing these measures. Using sustained vowels and connected speech from Japanese speakers across a wide range of dysphonia severities, we compared band-limited and full-band results against the auditory-perceptual judgments of breathiness, roughness, and the grade of hoarseness. Across utterance and perceptual dimensions, band-limiting consistently improved diagnostic performance, with particularly notable gains in mild dysphonia. These findings suggest that restricting analysis to the high-sensitivity auditory range reveals microperturbations that are masked by dominant low-frequency energy in full-band signals. This psychoacoustically guided approach enhances the clinical usefulness of traditional acoustic measures without requiring complex modeling. It is device-independent and suitable for telemedicine and real-world voice-assessment workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-44010-9
Primary Topic
Voice and Speech Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychoacoustically guided midfrequency band-limiting improves the diagnostic utility of classical acoustic measures in dysphonia

Toshihiro Kishikawa, Kiyohito Hosokawa, Takanari Kawabe, Itsuki Kitayama et al.
Scientific Reports
Voice and Speech Disorders
article

Psychoacoustically guided midfrequency band-limiting improves the diagnostic utility of classical acoustic measures in dysphonia

Toshihiro Kishikawa, Kiyohito Hosokawa, Takanari Kawabe, Itsuki Kitayama, Shinobu Iwaki, Hidenori Inohara, Yoshiyuki Ozono, Kenji Aruga, Yukinori Takenaka, Akira Miyauchi, Takeshi Tsuda, Misao Yoshida, Makoto Ogawa, Hidenori Tanaka
article en

Abstract

Human hearing is most sensitive around 3 kHz, where small changes in harmonic structure and noise are particularly noticeable. However, traditional or standard acoustic measures of dysphonia—jitter, shimmer, harmonics-to-noise ratio, and cepstral peak prominence smoothed—are usually calculated from full-band signals and do not account for this psychoacoustic weighting. Consequently, their diagnostic accuracy is often reduced in connected speech and cases of mild dysphonia, which are common clinical presentations. We tested a simple, low-cost preprocessing strategy that limited analysis to the 2–4 kHz frequency band before computing these measures. Using sustained vowels and connected speech from Japanese speakers across a wide range of dysphonia severities, we compared band-limited and full-band results against the auditory-perceptual judgments of breathiness, roughness, and the grade of hoarseness. Across utterance and perceptual dimensions, band-limiting consistently improved diagnostic performance, with particularly notable gains in mild dysphonia. These findings suggest that restricting analysis to the high-sensitivity auditory range reveals microperturbations that are masked by dominant low-frequency energy in full-band signals. This psychoacoustically guided approach enhances the clinical usefulness of traditional acoustic measures without requiring complex modeling. It is device-independent and suitable for telemedicine and real-world voice-assessment workflows.

Scientific Reports
Osaka Kaisei Hospital (JP), Kobe University Hospital (JP), Kuma Hospital (JP), Osaka International University (JP), The University of Osaka (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Voice and Speech Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.