Comparison of state-of-the-art error-correction coding for sequence-based DNA data storage
Many codecs with different error-correction approaches have been implemented for DNA data storage to date. However, no studies have systematically benchmarked codec implementations to establish their current state-of-the-art. Here, we use in silico and in vitro experiments to compare the performance of six representative codecs from literature. In isolation, these codecs can tolerate error rates up to 14% and a sequence loss of 65%. Under realistic conditions, we further establish that storage densities as high as 117 EB g<sup>-1</sup> are feasible using existing codecs and current synthesis and sequencing technologies. Verifying our results experimentally, we demonstrate data storage at 43 EB g<sup>-1</sup> using synthesis by material deposition and 13 EB g<sup>-1</sup> using electrochemical synthesis, employing existing codecs from literature. Besides closing in on the physical limits of DNA data storage, this study thus demonstrates the maturity of error-correction coding, defines its current state-of-the-art, and establishes best practices for codec benchmarking.
Authors
- Robert N. Grass (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6968-0823)
- Andreas L. Gimpel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-3292)
- Alex Remschak
- Wendelin J. Stark
- Reinhard Heckel
Institutions
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2026-03-14
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-70548-3
- Primary Topic
- DNA and Biological Computing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- European Commission
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich