A Meta-Analysis of Parasocial Relationships and Health: Examining Theoretical Mechanisms, Health Outcomes, and Moderating Factors

This meta-analysis reviews the literature on parasocial relationships (PSRs) and their association with health from 1979 to 2024. While previous work has established PSRs as influential in persuasive contexts, their specific role in health outcomes remains unclear. In a review of 58 studies, this meta-analysis finds that PSRs are positively associated with both beneficial and harmful health attitudes as well as with health information seeking and sharing. Supporting existing theoretical accounts, PSRs are positively correlated with variables that facilitate health outcomes, including perceived source credibility, risk perceptions, and self-efficacy, yet negatively correlated with resistance to persuasion. Moderation analyses reveal that the type of health condition, media personality, and use of experimental stimuli have a significant influence on the relationship between PSRs and health outcomes. These results extend our theoretical understanding of parasocial relationships in health contexts and offer practical implications for health communication practitioners, including the potential for PSRs to be leveraged for health behavior change while being mindful of potential harmful effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Communication
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2026.2641695
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meta-Analysis of Parasocial Relationships and Health: Examining Theoretical Mechanisms, Health Outcomes, and Moderating Factors

Nathan Walter, Camille J. Saucier, Rebecca Tukachinsky Forster, Emily A. Andrews
Health Communication
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

A Meta-Analysis of Parasocial Relationships and Health: Examining Theoretical Mechanisms, Health Outcomes, and Moderating Factors

Nathan Walter, Camille J. Saucier, Rebecca Tukachinsky Forster, Emily A. Andrews
article en

Abstract

This meta-analysis reviews the literature on parasocial relationships (PSRs) and their association with health from 1979 to 2024. While previous work has established PSRs as influential in persuasive contexts, their specific role in health outcomes remains unclear. In a review of 58 studies, this meta-analysis finds that PSRs are positively associated with both beneficial and harmful health attitudes as well as with health information seeking and sharing. Supporting existing theoretical accounts, PSRs are positively correlated with variables that facilitate health outcomes, including perceived source credibility, risk perceptions, and self-efficacy, yet negatively correlated with resistance to persuasion. Moderation analyses reveal that the type of health condition, media personality, and use of experimental stimuli have a significant influence on the relationship between PSRs and health outcomes. These results extend our theoretical understanding of parasocial relationships in health contexts and offer practical implications for health communication practitioners, including the potential for PSRs to be leveraged for health behavior change while being mindful of potential harmful effects.

Health Communication
Chapman University (US), Augusta University Health (US), Clemson University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.