Bridging the gap between mechanism and approval: Why 95% of analgesic trials fail to look beyond subjective scores and a proposal for change

The 0.7% likelihood of approval for novel analgesics from Phase I represents a systemic crisis hindering resolution of the global opioid epidemic and economic burden. This study identifies causes of this stagnation through a dual–faceted analysis of regulatory trends in Japan and global clinical trial failures between 2015 and 2025. Analysis of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) database revealed approximately 95% of primary endpoints in successful applications rely on unidimensional subjective pain intensity scores, whereas multi–faceted functional indicators represent approximately 5%. Concurrently, global data from Pharmaprojects identified an "Efficacy Wall", with failure rates of 63.4% in Phase II and 56.3% in Phase III. The predominant cause of late–stage discontinuation was a lack of efficacy, suggesting that subjective metrics are insufficient to distinguish therapeutic signals from variable placebo responses amidst high intra–individual variability. To revitalize the pipeline, we propose a paradigm shift focused on four strategic pillars: prioritizing multi–faceted functional outcomes aligned with international bio–psycho–social guidelines, integrating objective biomarkers, such as those monitored via electroencephalography (EEG), to mitigate subjective noise, implementing precision medicine through phenotyping utilizing frameworks such as the ICD–11 to identify high–responder populations, and utilizing real–world data (RWD) to manage the prohibitive costs of extended trials. Furthermore, we emphasize redefining the placebo effect as an endogenous pharmacological mechanism, particularly for evaluating digital therapeutics. Harmonizing these objective and multi–dimensional approaches with regulatory science is essential to bridge the gap between biological innovation and clinical approval, ensuring transformative non–opioid treatments reach patients worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PAIN RESEARCH
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11154/pain.41.11
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the gap between mechanism and approval: Why 95% of analgesic trials fail to look beyond subjective scores and a proposal for change

Takahiro Ushida, Aya Nakae, Hiroshi Aoki, Kenichi Nishiyama et al.
PAIN RESEARCH
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Bridging the gap between mechanism and approval: Why 95% of analgesic trials fail to look beyond subjective scores and a proposal for change

Takahiro Ushida, Aya Nakae, Hiroshi Aoki, Kenichi Nishiyama, Nobuyo Oya, Chie Kishimoto, Yoshitake Fujioka, Rumi Nojiri, Naoki Nagakura, Takako Matsubara
article en

Abstract

The 0.7% likelihood of approval for novel analgesics from Phase I represents a systemic crisis hindering resolution of the global opioid epidemic and economic burden. This study identifies causes of this stagnation through a dual–faceted analysis of regulatory trends in Japan and global clinical trial failures between 2015 and 2025. Analysis of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) database revealed approximately 95% of primary endpoints in successful applications rely on unidimensional subjective pain intensity scores, whereas multi–faceted functional indicators represent approximately 5%. Concurrently, global data from Pharmaprojects identified an "Efficacy Wall", with failure rates of 63.4% in Phase II and 56.3% in Phase III. The predominant cause of late–stage discontinuation was a lack of efficacy, suggesting that subjective metrics are insufficient to distinguish therapeutic signals from variable placebo responses amidst high intra–individual variability. To revitalize the pipeline, we propose a paradigm shift focused on four strategic pillars: prioritizing multi–faceted functional outcomes aligned with international bio–psycho–social guidelines, integrating objective biomarkers, such as those monitored via electroencephalography (EEG), to mitigate subjective noise, implementing precision medicine through phenotyping utilizing frameworks such as the ICD–11 to identify high–responder populations, and utilizing real–world data (RWD) to manage the prohibitive costs of extended trials. Furthermore, we emphasize redefining the placebo effect as an endogenous pharmacological mechanism, particularly for evaluating digital therapeutics. Harmonizing these objective and multi–dimensional approaches with regulatory science is essential to bridge the gap between biological innovation and clinical approval, ensuring transformative non–opioid treatments reach patients worldwide.

PAIN RESEARCHVol. 41(1)
Kobe Gakuin University (JP), Teikoku Seiyaku (Japan) (JP), Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (JP), Maruishi Pharmaceutical (Japan) (JP), Pain and Rehabilitation Medicine (US)
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.