A Wor(l)d of Agritourism? A Cross-national Validation of the Global Agritourism Network’s definition.

Abstract The growing popularity of agritourism highlights the need for a unified, global definition to ensure clarity and consistency. Until recently, the lack of such a definition hindered marketing, outreach and international collaboration. To address this, the Global Agritourism Network (GAN) formed a working group to conceptualize agritourism. A clear, shared definition is important to tell agritourism apart from other types of rural tourism and to identify what ‘real’ agritourism is, particularly as some activities may be purely commercial or diverting from the main goals of this agricultural enterprise. GAN’s definition includes four key components: agriculture diversification activity, agriculture-tourism intersection, authentic experiences, and showcasing resources. This paper presents 17 national examples from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe and Oceania to illustrate how they fit within GAN’s agritourism definition. These national examples highlight diversities in agritourism and its regional adaptations, offering in-depth insights into agriculture and tourism worldwide. The cross-national approach enhances global understanding of agritourism and supports comparative insights across disciplines and policy contexts. Broader impacts on rural development and education may emerge over time, however, the primary focus of this study lies in validating and contextualizing the GAN agritourism definition across national settings. As the GAN’s definition has gained social legitimacy, further case studies are needed to develop an impact assessment framework that strengthens agritourism’s role in marketing, rural development, and sustainable tourism efforts worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Tourismuswissenschaft
Published
2026-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/tw-2025-0035
Primary Topic
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Wor(l)d of Agritourism? A Cross-national Validation of the Global Agritourism Network’s definition.

Jossie B. Romero, Lisa Chase, Chadley R. Hollas, Chih Yu Hsiao et al.
Zeitschrift für Tourismuswissenschaft
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
article

A Wor(l)d of Agritourism? A Cross-national Validation of the Global Agritourism Network’s definition.

Jossie B. Romero, Lisa Chase, Chadley R. Hollas, Chih Yu Hsiao, Carla Barbieri, Shpresim Domi, Vincent P. Magnini, Erika Quendler, Allison K. Clark, Thomas Streifeneder, Magdalena Kubal-Czerwińska, Nino Sachaleli, Viktoriia Kiptenko, Adityavardhan Pathak, Claudia Gil Arroyo, Joseph Taremwa Ruhakana, Keleigh J. Cormier, Emily Wu, Marisa P. Eslao-Pamo, Kumar Bhatta, Tim Parsons, Jean D’Amour Maniragaba
article en

Abstract

Abstract The growing popularity of agritourism highlights the need for a unified, global definition to ensure clarity and consistency. Until recently, the lack of such a definition hindered marketing, outreach and international collaboration. To address this, the Global Agritourism Network (GAN) formed a working group to conceptualize agritourism. A clear, shared definition is important to tell agritourism apart from other types of rural tourism and to identify what ‘real’ agritourism is, particularly as some activities may be purely commercial or diverting from the main goals of this agricultural enterprise. GAN’s definition includes four key components: agriculture diversification activity, agriculture-tourism intersection, authentic experiences, and showcasing resources. This paper presents 17 national examples from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, Europe and Oceania to illustrate how they fit within GAN’s agritourism definition. These national examples highlight diversities in agritourism and its regional adaptations, offering in-depth insights into agriculture and tourism worldwide. The cross-national approach enhances global understanding of agritourism and supports comparative insights across disciplines and policy contexts. Broader impacts on rural development and education may emerge over time, however, the primary focus of this study lies in validating and contextualizing the GAN agritourism definition across national settings. As the GAN’s definition has gained social legitimacy, further case studies are needed to develop an impact assessment framework that strengthens agritourism’s role in marketing, rural development, and sustainable tourism efforts worldwide.

Zeitschrift für Tourismuswissenschaft
University of Vermont (US), Jagiellonian University (PL), University of Tasmania (AU), Eurac Research (IT), Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (UA), Grigol Robakidze University (GE), Partido State University (PH), Clearwater Group (United States) (US), Aditya Birla (India) (IN), Institute of Geography of the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK), Federal Institute of Agricultural Economics (AT), Forestry Tasmania (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.