Attitudes of medical and life sciences university students and postdoctoral fellows toward AI chatbots in education: an international cross-sectional survey

Artificial intelligence chatbots (AICs) are advanced systems capable of generating and processing human-like text, and are being increasingly integrated in various fields, including education. Despite their potential to significantly impact learning, little is known about university students’ and postdoctoral fellows’ (US&PD) views on AICs in educational settings. This study investigated the familiarity, perceptions, and factors influencing adoption of AICs by US&PDs in the life and medical sciences. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey. Recruitment involved two approaches: (1) using R script on PubMeD metadata to extract contact details of corresponding authors with recent MEDLINE-indexed publications, and (2) collecting publicly listed contact information of program administrators from the top 50 global, English-speaking universities, as ranked by the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) University World Rankings. Both authors and administrators were contacted and requested to forward the survey to US&PDs. The survey was administered via SurveyMonkey from February 2 to March 18, 2024, with two reminder emails sent between February 14 and 26, 2024. A total of 1209 responses from 73 countries were analyzed. Most respondents identified as female (62.07%) and were enrolled in doctoral (40.48%) or master’s programs (17.55%). Over 63% were familiar with AICs, with ChatGPT being the most used (60.3%). While many recognized the educational value of AICs, concerns about reliability and integration into academia persisted. Calls for more training and institutional support were common. The study underscores the potential and challenges of AICs in education. While enthusiasm exists, significant concerns remain about their implementation, requiring targeted training and policy development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-42085-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
52.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attitudes of medical and life sciences university students and postdoctoral fellows toward AI chatbots in education: an international cross-sectional survey

Jasleen Brar, Cynthia Lokker, Aimun Qadeer Shah, Emi Roni et al.
1 citations
Scientific Reports
AI in Service Interactions
52.10
article

Attitudes of medical and life sciences university students and postdoctoral fellows toward AI chatbots in education: an international cross-sectional survey

Jasleen Brar, Cynthia Lokker, Aimun Qadeer Shah, Emi Roni, Madiha Asna, Sylvia Kathirkamanathan, David Moher, Wendy Li, Jeremy Y. Ng, Alfonso Iorio, R. Brian Haynes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence chatbots (AICs) are advanced systems capable of generating and processing human-like text, and are being increasingly integrated in various fields, including education. Despite their potential to significantly impact learning, little is known about university students’ and postdoctoral fellows’ (US&PD) views on AICs in educational settings. This study investigated the familiarity, perceptions, and factors influencing adoption of AICs by US&PDs in the life and medical sciences. We conducted a cross-sectional online survey. Recruitment involved two approaches: (1) using R script on PubMeD metadata to extract contact details of corresponding authors with recent MEDLINE-indexed publications, and (2) collecting publicly listed contact information of program administrators from the top 50 global, English-speaking universities, as ranked by the Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) University World Rankings. Both authors and administrators were contacted and requested to forward the survey to US&PDs. The survey was administered via SurveyMonkey from February 2 to March 18, 2024, with two reminder emails sent between February 14 and 26, 2024. A total of 1209 responses from 73 countries were analyzed. Most respondents identified as female (62.07%) and were enrolled in doctoral (40.48%) or master’s programs (17.55%). Over 63% were familiar with AICs, with ChatGPT being the most used (60.3%). While many recognized the educational value of AICs, concerns about reliability and integration into academia persisted. Calls for more training and institutional support were common. The study underscores the potential and challenges of AICs in education. While enthusiasm exists, significant concerns remain about their implementation, requiring targeted training and policy development.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University of Ottawa (CA), Ottawa Hospital (CA), Impact (CA), Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA), Bosch Health Campus, University of Tübingen (DE), Robert Bosch (Germany) (DE), McMaster University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
AI in Service Interactions
52.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.