A systematic review of factors contributing to partners’ negative birth experiences

Most partners attend the birth of their infant. Partners can be psychologically impacted by the birth they witness. It is important to understand what may contribute to this experience being appraised as negative, so that services can develop support for partners. This systematic review aimed to explore partners’ reported negative experiences of childbirth. The objective was to synthesise qualitative literature on aspects of experience that contributed to partners appraising childbirth as negative. ENTREQ framework for reporting the synthesis of qualitative health research was used to report findings. A qualitative meta-synthesis design was adopted. Searches were conducted using the databases PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, EMCare, and Web of Science using search terms relating to partners and childbirth experiences. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Sixteen studies were included in the review. Themes generated from the meta-synthesis were ‘high negative emotionality during the birth’, ‘unprepared/not going as expected’, ‘communication from healthcare professionals’, ‘exclusion’, ‘clarity of role’, and ‘perceived low control’. Partners experienced intense negative emotions, particularly when births did not go as expected, and these feelings were amplified by poor communication, exclusion, and uncertainty about their role. Feeling unprepared, both practically and emotionally, and perceiving a lack of control were central contributors to negative experiences. Partners’ experiences were shaped not only by the birth itself but also by the quality of healthcare interactions and the clarity of their own role, with cultural context further influencing expectations and emotional responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-026-08889-6
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic review of factors contributing to partners’ negative birth experiences

Pauline Slade, R. D. M. Hunter, Leonardo De Pascalis
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

A systematic review of factors contributing to partners’ negative birth experiences

Pauline Slade, R. D. M. Hunter, Leonardo De Pascalis
article en

Abstract

Most partners attend the birth of their infant. Partners can be psychologically impacted by the birth they witness. It is important to understand what may contribute to this experience being appraised as negative, so that services can develop support for partners. This systematic review aimed to explore partners’ reported negative experiences of childbirth. The objective was to synthesise qualitative literature on aspects of experience that contributed to partners appraising childbirth as negative. ENTREQ framework for reporting the synthesis of qualitative health research was used to report findings. A qualitative meta-synthesis design was adopted. Searches were conducted using the databases PsycINFO, Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, EMCare, and Web of Science using search terms relating to partners and childbirth experiences. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Sixteen studies were included in the review. Themes generated from the meta-synthesis were ‘high negative emotionality during the birth’, ‘unprepared/not going as expected’, ‘communication from healthcare professionals’, ‘exclusion’, ‘clarity of role’, and ‘perceived low control’. Partners experienced intense negative emotions, particularly when births did not go as expected, and these feelings were amplified by poor communication, exclusion, and uncertainty about their role. Feeling unprepared, both practically and emotionally, and perceiving a lack of control were central contributors to negative experiences. Partners’ experiences were shaped not only by the birth itself but also by the quality of healthcare interactions and the clarity of their own role, with cultural context further influencing expectations and emotional responses.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Bologna (IT)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A systematic review of factors contributing to partners’ negative birth experiences — Pauline Slade, R. D. M. Hunter, et al. · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS