Revision rate of large head diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: long-term results

To assess the long-term outcomes (minimum 10 years) of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a large head diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) acetabular prosthesis. In total, 108 primary THAs (98 patients) were performed using a Cormet MoM acetabular prosthesis. Clinical hip function, radiographic evaluation and revision rate were evaluated. Of the 98 patients, 15 (16 hips) followed up for < 10 years were excluded. Among the remaining 92 hips (83 patients), 35 (38.0%) had pseudotumors (PTs) detected by MRI at an average of 5.0 years after the initial THA. On radiographic evaluation, osteolysis (OL) was noted in 10 hips (10.8%) on the cup side and six hips (6.5%) on the stem side. Loosening was observed in six hips (6.5%) on the cup side, whereas no loosening was noted on the stem side. Twenty-three hips (22 patients) were switched to metal-on-polyethylene articulation between 1.2 and 14.7 years (mean: 6.3 years) postoperatively due to pain, swelling, infection, and/or implant failure. In this analysis, cup failure (OL, loosening, or both) was the highest in patients with revision surgery compared to those with PTs but not revision surgery and those without PTs. The prevalence of PTs was 38.0%, and that of revision surgery was 25%. Some cases required revisions even after 10 years following surgery. We advise against its continued use and recommend regular clinical surveillance, such as MRI, to detect adverse reactions to metal debris and periprosthetic joint infection early.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-026-06258-8
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revision rate of large head diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: long-term results

Masahiro Hasegawa, Hiroki Wakabayashi, Yohei Naito, Shine Tone et al.
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Revision rate of large head diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: long-term results

Masahiro Hasegawa, Hiroki Wakabayashi, Yohei Naito, Shine Tone, Akihiro Sudo
article en

Abstract

To assess the long-term outcomes (minimum 10 years) of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a large head diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) acetabular prosthesis. In total, 108 primary THAs (98 patients) were performed using a Cormet MoM acetabular prosthesis. Clinical hip function, radiographic evaluation and revision rate were evaluated. Of the 98 patients, 15 (16 hips) followed up for < 10 years were excluded. Among the remaining 92 hips (83 patients), 35 (38.0%) had pseudotumors (PTs) detected by MRI at an average of 5.0 years after the initial THA. On radiographic evaluation, osteolysis (OL) was noted in 10 hips (10.8%) on the cup side and six hips (6.5%) on the stem side. Loosening was observed in six hips (6.5%) on the cup side, whereas no loosening was noted on the stem side. Twenty-three hips (22 patients) were switched to metal-on-polyethylene articulation between 1.2 and 14.7 years (mean: 6.3 years) postoperatively due to pain, swelling, infection, and/or implant failure. In this analysis, cup failure (OL, loosening, or both) was the highest in patients with revision surgery compared to those with PTs but not revision surgery and those without PTs. The prevalence of PTs was 38.0%, and that of revision surgery was 25%. Some cases required revisions even after 10 years following surgery. We advise against its continued use and recommend regular clinical surveillance, such as MRI, to detect adverse reactions to metal debris and periprosthetic joint infection early.

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma SurgeryVol. 146(1)
Mie University (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.