Classification of health product defect reports by deep learning

Quality defects in substandard medicines represent a threat to public health. Rapid and accurate identification of these defects is critical to prioritise the cases and implement regulatory measures. However, the development of surveillance systems to classify reports of health product defects remains a largely unmet need in medicine safety monitoring. The objective of this study is to implement an AI system to support the classification and prioritization of health product defect reports. To develop a deep learning system for the classification of health product defect reports, 13,830 reports collected between 2010 and 2021 were used. The reports were labelled by a panel of pharmacovigilance experts into 21 categories following standardised medical terminology. Our system harnesses state-of-the-art language algorithms that extract rich textual features to classify the reports. The functionality of the system is enhanced with explainable features that provide interpretability and actionable insights to decision-makers. Our system achieves top-1, top-2, and top-3 accuracies of 86%, 93%, and 96%, respectively. There is a statistically significant positive correlation between sample size and top-1 (Pearson’s r: 0.643; 95% CI: [0.2921, 0.8411]; p-value: 0.0016), top-2 (Pearson’s r: 0.735; 95% CI: [0.4439, 0.8856]; p-value: 0.0001), and top-3 (Pearson’s r: 0.635; 95% CI: [0.2808, 0.8374]; p-value: 0.0020) performance metrics. Likewise, model accuracy is positively correlated with confidence scores (Pearson’s r: 0.927; 95% CI: [0.8253, 0.9703]; p-value < 0.00001). A feature analysis reveals that the most influential words in model decision are conceptually and semantically related to their respective product defect categories. Our model has been validated with prospective data. The developed classification system allows for standardisation in case triage, and potentially improves case prioritisation and processing workflows, leading to more prompt response for quality defects with high public health impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-43961-3
Primary Topic
Text and Document Classification Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of health product defect reports by deep learning

Pei San Ang, Sreemanee Raaj Dorajoo, Vicente Sancenón, Andy W. A. Ta et al.
Scientific Reports
Text and Document Classification Technologies
article

Classification of health product defect reports by deep learning

Pei San Ang, Sreemanee Raaj Dorajoo, Vicente Sancenón, Andy W. A. Ta, Lin Zou, Han Leong Goh, Yiting Huang, Desmond C. H. Teo
article en

Abstract

Quality defects in substandard medicines represent a threat to public health. Rapid and accurate identification of these defects is critical to prioritise the cases and implement regulatory measures. However, the development of surveillance systems to classify reports of health product defects remains a largely unmet need in medicine safety monitoring. The objective of this study is to implement an AI system to support the classification and prioritization of health product defect reports. To develop a deep learning system for the classification of health product defect reports, 13,830 reports collected between 2010 and 2021 were used. The reports were labelled by a panel of pharmacovigilance experts into 21 categories following standardised medical terminology. Our system harnesses state-of-the-art language algorithms that extract rich textual features to classify the reports. The functionality of the system is enhanced with explainable features that provide interpretability and actionable insights to decision-makers. Our system achieves top-1, top-2, and top-3 accuracies of 86%, 93%, and 96%, respectively. There is a statistically significant positive correlation between sample size and top-1 (Pearson’s r: 0.643; 95% CI: [0.2921, 0.8411]; p-value: 0.0016), top-2 (Pearson’s r: 0.735; 95% CI: [0.4439, 0.8856]; p-value: 0.0001), and top-3 (Pearson’s r: 0.635; 95% CI: [0.2808, 0.8374]; p-value: 0.0020) performance metrics. Likewise, model accuracy is positively correlated with confidence scores (Pearson’s r: 0.927; 95% CI: [0.8253, 0.9703]; p-value < 0.00001). A feature analysis reveals that the most influential words in model decision are conceptually and semantically related to their respective product defect categories. Our model has been validated with prospective data. The developed classification system allows for standardisation in case triage, and potentially improves case prioritisation and processing workflows, leading to more prompt response for quality defects with high public health impact.

Scientific Reports
Health Sciences Authority (SG), Synapse Biomedical (United States) (US), Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (SG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Text and Document Classification Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.