Guidelines for Conducting Sensitivity Analyses in Process Simulations for Solid Earth Geosciences

Abstract Numerical simulations are widely used as tools to aid in understanding processes or making predictions about states and their evolution in time. However, in the process of simulation setup, a multitude of choices and simplifications must be made—from the definition of the physical laws implemented, to model discretization and spatial parameterization, and the definition of initial and boundary conditions. In addition, the defined parameters are often subject to significant uncertainties. It therefore becomes paramount to investigate the extent to which a model output, such as the predicted temperature or pressure state at a location, is influenced by a certain input parameter, such as the thermal conductivity of a geological unit. Attempts to resolve this question are thus included in many research papers, and are generally referred to as sensitivity analyses. However, only a small portion of studies actually perform a sensitivity analysis in a mathematical sense. We propose that this omission occurs for two reasons: (1) a lack of knowledge about the different types of sensitivity analyses, and how they can be properly described and formulated, and (2) a lack of awareness about the tools that are readily available to perform structured sensitivity analyses. In this contribution, we aim to fill this gap through a review of the mathematical foundations of sensitivity analyses, a presentation of the different types, several intuitive examples, and a recommendation for the choice of a suitable method, with the aim of providing guidance for wider application of suitable sensitivity analyses in subsurface process simulations. Graphic Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematical Geosciences
Published
2026-03-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-025-10267-5
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines for Conducting Sensitivity Analyses in Process Simulations for Solid Earth Geosciences

Denise Degen, Florian Wellmann
Mathematical Geosciences
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Guidelines for Conducting Sensitivity Analyses in Process Simulations for Solid Earth Geosciences

Denise Degen, Florian Wellmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Numerical simulations are widely used as tools to aid in understanding processes or making predictions about states and their evolution in time. However, in the process of simulation setup, a multitude of choices and simplifications must be made—from the definition of the physical laws implemented, to model discretization and spatial parameterization, and the definition of initial and boundary conditions. In addition, the defined parameters are often subject to significant uncertainties. It therefore becomes paramount to investigate the extent to which a model output, such as the predicted temperature or pressure state at a location, is influenced by a certain input parameter, such as the thermal conductivity of a geological unit. Attempts to resolve this question are thus included in many research papers, and are generally referred to as sensitivity analyses. However, only a small portion of studies actually perform a sensitivity analysis in a mathematical sense. We propose that this omission occurs for two reasons: (1) a lack of knowledge about the different types of sensitivity analyses, and how they can be properly described and formulated, and (2) a lack of awareness about the tools that are readily available to perform structured sensitivity analyses. In this contribution, we aim to fill this gap through a review of the mathematical foundations of sensitivity analyses, a presentation of the different types, several intuitive examples, and a recommendation for the choice of a suitable method, with the aim of providing guidance for wider application of suitable sensitivity analyses in subsurface process simulations. Graphic Abstract

Mathematical Geosciences
Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), Fraunhofer Research Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geotechnologies IEG (DE), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, nukleare Sicherheit und Verbraucherschutz
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.