Readability assessment of English translations of Chinese classics: a study based on XGBoost and BP neural networks

The English translation of Chinese classics is crucial for cultural dissemination and East-West exchanges, but assessing their readability poses challenges due to linguistic and cultural differences. This study applies natural language processing and machine learning to evaluate the readability of five English translations of The Analects by D. C. Lau, James Legge, William Jennings, Edward Slingerland, and Burton Watson. Using a corpus with 4236 lines for model training and 2824 held-out lines for application and reporting, 114 readability features were analyzed. Two machine learning techniques, XGBoost and BP Neural Network, were employed to develop customized readability models. The results, evaluated using mean squared error (MSE) and R², with Pearson correlations reported for feature screening and descriptive analysis, reveal that both models achieve high predictive performance, with the BP Neural Network slightly outperforming XGBoost. Key factors influencing readability include sentence length, syntactic structure, lexical complexity, and lexical density (used as a proxy for information density). This study offers a novel method for assessing and improving the readability of multiple English translations of The Analects. While the approach may be potentially transferable to other Chinese classics, such generalization requires further validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-03-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06878-w
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Readability assessment of English translations of Chinese classics: a study based on XGBoost and BP neural networks

Liwei Yang, Guijun Zhou
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Text Readability and Simplification
article

Readability assessment of English translations of Chinese classics: a study based on XGBoost and BP neural networks

Liwei Yang, Guijun Zhou
article en

Abstract

The English translation of Chinese classics is crucial for cultural dissemination and East-West exchanges, but assessing their readability poses challenges due to linguistic and cultural differences. This study applies natural language processing and machine learning to evaluate the readability of five English translations of The Analects by D. C. Lau, James Legge, William Jennings, Edward Slingerland, and Burton Watson. Using a corpus with 4236 lines for model training and 2824 held-out lines for application and reporting, 114 readability features were analyzed. Two machine learning techniques, XGBoost and BP Neural Network, were employed to develop customized readability models. The results, evaluated using mean squared error (MSE) and R², with Pearson correlations reported for feature screening and descriptive analysis, reveal that both models achieve high predictive performance, with the BP Neural Network slightly outperforming XGBoost. Key factors influencing readability include sentence length, syntactic structure, lexical complexity, and lexical density (used as a proxy for information density). This study offers a novel method for assessing and improving the readability of multiple English translations of The Analects. While the approach may be potentially transferable to other Chinese classics, such generalization requires further validation.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Heilongjiang International University (CN), Northeast Forestry University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Text Readability and Simplification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.